I Saw the TV Glow May 13, 2024 By: Button Hunter Friesen I couldn't tell what feelings I was experiencing while watching I Saw the TV Glow , but I can definitely tell you I was feeling something . There was terror, bewilderment, wonder, curiosity, nostalgia, and some sort of feeling of childhood innocence. And yet there was none of those things, at least in the forms I’d expected or had experienced before. I stared at the screen with the same hypnotized energy as the main characters watching their favorite show, The Pink Opaque . Was I liking what I was watching, and did it even make sense? I didn’t know then, and I still don’t know now. But I can’t get it out of my head, and that’s what’s most important. It all started in the late ‘90s, an era where the only things to watch were what was on TV at the time you were flipping through the channels. For seventh-grader Owen (played by Ian Foreman in the younger years, and Justice Smith when he’s older), everything is just a series of unmemorable images and noise. There’s something off about him, and it’s not just some childhood mood phase. He’s on a conveyor belt going through life, never interacting with anything or anyone. That is, until he stumbles upon a show called The Pink Opaque airing on the Young Adult Network (this movie’s version of The CW Network). It’s a Buffy-esque teen drama about two girls with psychic powers fighting a monster-of-the-week, with the big bad guy named Mr. Melancholy looming throughout the seasons. The show speaks to him, yet he doesn’t exactly know what it’s saying. He just knows that he can’t live without hearing it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kymDzCgPwj0 Writer/director Jane Schoenbrun understands the allure of a fictional piece of art to kids of a certain age. Every adolescent has some inner holes they feel like they need to fill, but don’t know how, and there’s nothing more powerful than plugging them with some special work that’s just your own. I could go into lengths about how much The Walking Dead meant to me as a 12-year-old middle schooler. Of course, millions of other people watched that show at its height, but the fact that I had to secretly watch it under the covers with my Kindle was something that made it mine. For Owen, The Pink Opaque is a show geared towards older kids that airs after his bedtime, meaning he has to sneak out of the house to watch it. There’s a thrill to the danger of being caught, and an indescribable satisfaction to the amount of work that needs to be done to get yourself in the right place at the right time. It’s the hidden price we pay through streaming, as everything feels just a little less special when you can have it whenever you want. Owen’s haven for the show is the home of Maddy (Brigette Lundy-Paine), a ninth-grader who’s probably the show’s biggest fan. The show acts as a coping mechanism as they deal with her abusive stepdad and the overall shittiness high schoolers direct toward those who don’t align with their rigid constructs of gender and sexuality. Despite their opposite sexualities, I Saw the TV Glow is a love story for Owen and Maddy, with Smith and Lundy-Paine wonderfully selling the sense of belonging they desire from each other. Those Saturday nights in Maddy’s basement were the only moments they had to be their true selves. Also mixed within this incredibly unique cocktail are some unsettling sequences and imagery. I know it’s a clichéd comparison to make, but there’s a Lynchian quality to all of it. This is not a horror movie, nor are there any scenes with the sole intention to scare you, yet some moments chilled me to the bone. Much of it comes from Schoenbrun’s willingness to keep everything understated and shrouded in mystery, even if the inability to provide clear answers leaves a little much left on the table. But it also comes with excellent production qualities within the film and the fictional show. The ‘90s low-budget aesthetic of The Pink Opaque is authentically recreated, with the creature design warranting the Oscar recognition that these types of films never get. Schoenbrun made their name with the 2021 feature We’re All Going to the World’s Fair , a seminal work on creepypastas and underground internet culture. While its release during the pandemic definitely enhanced its aspects of loneliness, it also caused it to be sucked into the vortex of obscurity like so many other independent projects. Thankfully, I Saw the TV Glow doesn’t have those dire circumstances swirling around it and is being handled by A24, meaning there’s no excuse not to check this out. A24 will release I Saw the TV Glow in select theaters on May 03rd, followed by a nationwide expansion on May 17th. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

Power Ballad May 27, 2026 By: Button Hunter Friesen Martin Scorsese has his gangsters, Steven Spielberg has his aliens, Guillermo del Toro has his monsters, Paul Schrader has his lonely men, Woody Allen has his neurotics, and Michael Mann has his criminals. They say to write what you know, a piece of instruction that many filmmakers have taken to heart throughout their careers. Of course, detours can always occur, but the road always leads back home sooner or later. And as much as we might decry their unoriginality, we wouldn’t have it any other way. Who else to tell these stories than those who know them best? Added to that list is Irish writer/director John Carney, the filmmaker who holds the title of being the world’s biggest folk music lover. He entered the scene with Once in 2007, a love story about two struggling musicians in Dublin. While a tiny production, the film won the Oscar for Best Original Song for “Falling Slowly.” 2013’s Begin Again shifted that story to America, with Keira Knightley playing a singer and Mark Ruffalo as a down-on-his-luck record executive. Another Oscar nomination would be earned for the song “Lost Stars.” He moved back to Dublin for Sing Street in 2016, which rode the indie circuit to enthusiastic reviews for its youthful exuberance. The two lands finally came together in 2023 with Flora and Son , starring American Joseph Gordon-Levitt alongside Eve Hewson in a Dublin-set story about a mother and musician coming together through song. His latest film, Power Ballad , more or less repeats that formula with a heavy “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” sort of attitude. American transplant Rick (Paul Rudd) earns his keep as a wedding singer for a cover band in Dublin (the boxes are already being checked). He came to the island over a decade ago as part of an up-and-coming band. Then he met Rachel, fell in love, and has remained across the pond ever since. For as much as the wedding guests love his renditions of the classics, Rick always feels like he’s going through the motions, never fully expressing himself as an artist. Every time he sneaks an original song into the playlist, the audience flatlines. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um_WWbB8Tm0 During one of his performances, the bride and groom turn out to be best friends with the former boy band star Danny Wilson (Nick Jonas). Per their request, he performs alongside Rick, the pair instantly hitting it off to classic songs that inspired them to grab the microphone. Over some beers, Rick shares with Danny his song titled “How to Write a Song (Without You)," the titular ballad he wrote for his daughter years back and is most proud of. In this initial act, Carney displays his affection for the creative process, as well as the dogged pursuit it requires. When Rick is performing one of his songs for the wedding guests, the dozens of tuxedos and dresses quickly become tens of thousands of screaming fans packing a stadium. The camera swirls around him as he belts his heart out. It doesn’t matter that Rudd isn’t a particularly gifted singer; the emotional high he displays tells us all we need to know. As with all things, money eventually gets in the way. Stuck in a creative rut that hasn’t allowed his solo career to flourish, Danny decides to pass off Rick’s song as his own. It soon becomes a chart-topping hit, with Rick eventually hearing it over the loudspeaker in a store. His contentment with being a perpetually struggling musician is quickly replaced with anger and jealousy. Deep down, he always knew that his song was worth something. And now he’s hearing it, yet the credit is nowhere to be found. For as much as his act is clearly portrayed as wrong, Danny isn’t some malicious figure trying to scheme his way to the top. He respects the legends and puts pressure on himself to branch out creatively. But with money and large record labels behind him comes expectations, and the fact that any slip up could spell the end of his career. He needs to produce certified hits and be on magazine covers. Similar to Rudd’s singing ability, Jonas isn’t the strongest actor. But through smart casting and Carney’s direction, he fulfills the presence required of his character. There’s a tiny bit of tedium as the debate over the authorship of the song consumes the entire second half. Rick wrote the song, but Danny is the one who turned it into a hit. None of this is new ground for Carney, and there’s nothing too special about the filmmaking. It’s a lot of heart-to-heart conversations about the power of music, everything wrapped in a feel-good coating that will likely have you driving with the windows down on these nice summer nights. Lionsgate will release Power Ballad in select theaters on May 29th, followed by a nationwide expansion on June 05th. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

Final 2025 Oscar Nomination Predictions January 21, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen We’re finally here! After months of festivals, box office results, and precursor awards, it’s finally time to put the chips down on who will find themselves in the Academy’s good graces. Things are much more chaotic compared to last year, where you could place Oppenheimer , Killers of the Flower Moon , Poor Things , and Barbie into nearly every category and come out with a decent record. This all leads me to my most important lesson of Oscar prognosticating: You have to go in with the mindset that you’re going to get 25% of your predictions wrong. The top score over at GoldDerby for last year’s nominations was around 80%. I like to go in with the same mindset I have for golf; which is not to make the most great shots, but to make the least bad ones. A gutsy shot tends to backfire more than it succeeds, which doesn’t bode well in a game where every shot counts. What does that mean here? It means not trying to overcomplicate things, and focusing your attention only on what’s needed. Go with the logical picks that favor the probabilities, and only go out on a limb for something you really feel is going to hit. As a focus tool, I’ve devised each category into three levels of likelihood for a nomination: Locks, Safe, and Shaky. Here’s a breakdown of how those categories are defined: Locks are virtually guaranteed to get a nomination. They’re more focused on winning the Oscar, with the nomination only being a formality. The only time you should spend on them is what it takes to write their names down on your predictions. A lock being snubbed is cause for headlines, and that’s something you can’t predict. Safes seem very likely to happen, and a snub would be a major talking point. They’ve hit pretty much every precursor they could, and have displayed support from the voting body. But there might be a hiccup in their campaign or a nagging feeling that there’s reason for doubt. Someone like Viola Davis in The Woman King fits this description. She was nominated at every precursor and is a titan in the industry. But the film just wasn’t landing in other categories, which led her to lose steam. Shaky is where you find a group of people fighting for those spots. They’ve hit some places and missed others, or their work goes against what the branch tends to favor. They might also have legitimate reasons for being a surprise nomination or a not-so-surprising snub. Something I’ve leaned away from in recent years is stats. There are just way too many variables at play: voter demographics, voter quantity, precursors influence, Academy rules, cultural sentiment, etc. It’s like debating if Magic Johnson or Steph Curry had a better NBA career. How can you compare two players who played in totally different eras and wildly different styles of play? Stats are helpful in some cases, but they should rarely be used as the primary justification for a prediction. As a matter of transparency, I will not be predicting the three short categories: Live-Action Short, Animated Short, and Documentary Short. It’s a fool’s errand to try and provide analysis for a category where I’ve seen none of the contenders and has no precursors to guide the way. I’ll just be going with the GoldDerby consensus. Without further ado, let’s get started! Best Picture Locks Conclave Emilia Pérez The Brutalist Anora Wicked Safe A Complete Unknown The Substance Dune: Part Two Shaky A Real Pain Nickel Boys Sing Sing has exemplified the "we're so back / we're so cooked" theme all season. It's done well at the smaller bodies, only to slip up once the lights get brighter. But it still has nominations for Adapted Screenplay and Lead Actor locked up, which lends just enough support to it holding on. But that PGA nomination for A Real Pain was a huge shot in the arm to go along with Kieran Culkin’s dominance, and Nickel Boys is still one of the most acclaimed films of the year. Unfortunately, I have to kick Sing Sing out, something I didn’t think was possible as I had it as a potential Best Picture winner just a few months ago. Best Director Locks Brady Corbet (The Brutalist) Jacques Audiard (Emilia Pérez) Safe Sean Baker (Anora) Edward Berger (Conclave) Shaky Coralie Fargeat (The Substance) The director’s branch of the Academy is only rivaled by the Documentary Feature branch in terms of being insular and having its own rules of who gets in and who doesn’t. It’s one of the few categories where you can semi-logically predict a snub for someone who has hit every precursor, or a surprise nomination for someone who hasn’t appeared anywhere else. Although Edward Berger didn't make it in for All Quiet on the Western Front despite that film's overwhelming dominance, he's firmly been promoted from outsider status and has an even bigger Best Picture contender with Conclave . The last spot seems to be between Coralie Fargeat and RaMell Ross, with the former having both the stats (GG, CCA, and BAFTA nominations) and momentum to back her up. Ross may not have either of those, but what he accomplishes in Nickel Boys is exactly the type of auteur-driven work that this branch admires. He would be following in the footsteps of Ruben Östlund and Jonathan Glazer, both of which got in when the stats said that they should be counted out. Best Original Screenplay Locks Anora (Sean Baker) The Brutalist (Brady Corbet & Mona Fastvold) A Real Pain (Jesse Eisenberg) Safe The Substance (Coralie Fargeat) Shaky September 5 (Tim Fehlbaum & Moritz Binder) We likely have three films vying for one final slot: All We Imagine as Light , Hard Truths , and September 5 . The PGA nomination for September 5 illustrated that it has the most legitimate shot at a Best Picture nomination of the trio, which pretty much gets it in by default. I would have had a tougher time choosing it over All We Imagine as Light if Payal Kapadia’s film hadn’t had such an unexpectedly lackluster at the BAFTA nominations. Of course, I would not be surprised if Mike Leigh got in instead for Hard Truths , which would be his sixth career nomination in the category. But he wasn't even longlisted by his hometown BAFTA, putting a big dent in those hopes. Best Adapted Screenplay Locks Conclave (Peter Straughn) Safe Emilia Pérez (Jacques Audiard) A Complete Unknown (James Mangold & Jay Cocks) Nickel Boys (RaMell Ross & Joslyn Barnes) Sing Sing (Greg Kwedar & Clint Bentley) It’s been a bit of a struggle to predict the other four nominees who will eventually lose to Conclave . As I mentioned in the Best Picture category, I had Sing Sing as a cinch to win here a couple of months ago, and now I’m wondering if it stays in. Granted, there isn’t that much competition for the final slot, so I might as well see it all the way through. Best Lead Actor Locks Adrian Brody (The Brutalist) Timothée Chalamet (A Complete Unknown) Ralph Fiennes (Conclave) Colman Domingo (Sing Sing) Safe Daniel Craig (Queer) We've been working with the same group of five men for months now. None of them have wavered, even when they were supposed to (Craig making it in at SAG was truly shocking). Sebastian Stan is the next closest contender, but for which film? The Apprentice did well at BAFTA, and he just won a Golden Globe for his performance in A Different Man . With that kind of intense vote splitting, it's hard for me to make a case for him. Best Lead Actress Locks Karla Sofía Gascón (Emilia Pérez) Mikey Madison (Anora) Demi Moore (The Substance) Shaky Cynthia Erivo (Wicked) Fernanda Torres (I’m Still Here) While the leading men have been sitting comfortably for months, the leading ladies have been thrown into chaos at every precursor. It feels like we've settled on a pretty sturdy set of four nominees, with that last slot being a bloodbath. There have only been two instances in the entire history of the Golden Globes where the winner of Best Lead Actress - Drama wasn't nominated at the Oscars. The first was because of a three-way tie in 1988 between Jodie Foster, Shirley MacLaine, and Sigourney Weaver (MacLaine was not Oscar-nominated), and the second was in 2008 when Kate Winslet won the Globe for Revolutionary Road, only for her to be nominated (and eventually) win in lead at the Oscar for The Reader . This year's winner, Fernanda Torres, gave a wonderful speech and appeared in a beloved movie with many passionate fans. She's still in the bubble because the Globes have been the only place she's shown up at, not even being longlisted by BAFTA. On the other hand, the Globes have been the only place that Marianne Jean-Baptiste has missed (she technically missed SAG, but that was never going to happen), which includes a historic trifecta of victories at NYFCC, LAFCA, and NSFC. Whoever misses between them, it's going to be unprecedented. And even with all that being said, there are still heavyweights like Nicole Kidman and Angelina Jolie. Neither of them has performed that well throughout the precursors, but you can never fully write them off. Best Supporting Actor Locks Kieran Culkin (A Real Pain) Safe Guy Pearce (The Brutalist) Edward Norton (A Complete Unknown) Shaky Yura Borisov (Anora) Jeremy Strong (The Apprentice) Similar to the Best Adapted Screenplay, we're finding four other nominees who will eventually lose to Kieran Culkin. Denzel Washington can get in on name alone (looking at you Roman J. Israel, Esq. ), but his miss at SAG was a little puzzling, and BAFTA was never going to help him (he’s still yet to receive a single acting nomination from them). The ascendancy of Yura Borisov has been one of the biggest stories of the season, and he's gotten in everywhere he could at this point. And then there’s Jeremy Strong, who found his way in after getting both a SAG and BAFTA nomination right as Oscar voting was starting. Best Supporting Actress Locks Zoe Saldaña (Emilia Pérez) Ariana Grande (Wicked) Safe Isabella Rossellini (Conclave) Shaky Felicity Jones (The Brutalist) Jamie Lee Curtis (The Last Showgirl) This is the toughest acting category to predict, with Saldaña and Grande being the only names that will appear on everyone's prediction sheets. Isabella Rossellini feels pretty safe for Conclave . Her missing SAG wasn't great, but she's an industry legend, has enough other precursor support, and appears in a big Best Picture player. The same can be said for Felicity Jones (minus the legend part). I've leaned into The Substance in every other above-the-line category, but Margaret Qualley just hasn’t shown up where she’s needed to. She’s been losing lately to Jamie Lee Curtis, who we’ve learned is one of the most beloved figures in Hollywood. And she’s an excellent campaigner, so good that I just can’t bet against her. Danielle Deadwyler would also make a lot of sense after her SAG revitalization. But we already went down this road with her a few years ago for Till. Could we see a repeat, or will voters make sure this doesn't happen again? Best Cinematography Locks The Brutalist Safe Nosferatu Shaky Conclave Dune: Part Two Maria Last year’s nomination for El Conde showed that Edward Lachmann only needs an ASC nomination to have a legitimate chance of breaking into this category, which bodes well for Maria . The rest of this lineup appeared at both the BAFTA and ASC nominations, pretty much securing their spot here. We’ve known for a while that this branch has a fetish for black-and-white, so I wouldn’t be surprised if The Girl with the Needle were to sneak in. Best Film Editing Locks Conclave Safe Emilia Pérez Anora Shaky Dune: Part Two September 5 Although this category tends to be filled with top-tier Best Picture contenders, The Brutalist finds itself on the outside looking in because of its startling omissions from ACE and BAFTA. It could still get in based on pedigree, pushing out fringe contenders like Dune: Part Two and September 5 . And then there are even films like Challengers and The Substance that showed up at ACE. Best Original Score Locks The Brutalist Conclave Emilia Pérez Safe The Wild Robot Shaky Challengers It's only been a few years since Justin Hurwitz won the Golden Globe Award for Original Score for First Man , only to be totally snubbed by the Oscars. That means this year's winners Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross ( Challengers ) can't go into nomination morning feeling confident, especially since they were also not longlisted by BAFTA. But they're aided by the fact that there isn't a clear alternative to them. If it had to be someone, I'd look out for branch favorite Alberto Iglesias, who scored Pedro Almodóvar's The Room Next Door and was nominated for their previous collaboration for Parallel Mothers . Best Original Song Locks El Mal (Emilia Pérez) Mi Camino (Emilia Pérez) Kiss the Sky (The Wild Robot) Safe The Journey (The Six Triple Eight) Shaky Harper and Will Go West (Will & Harper) There are three things that are certain in life: Death, taxes, and Diane Warren getting an Oscar nomination. She's on 15 career nominations… with no wins. The Six Triple Eight is a blockbuster compared to the films she's gotten nominated for over the past few years (has anyone watched Tell It Like a Woman?). "Compress/Repress" got in at both the Golden Globes and CCA, so it would make sense to have it take that last slot. But I’m going to throw a bit of a curveball in the form of a documentary song, which this branch tends to favor. Best Sound Locks Dune: Part Two Wicked Emilia Pérez Safe A Complete Unknown Shaky Alien: Romulus Alien: Romulus was shortlisted in quite a few categories, so it would make sense for it to get a nomination somewhere. We had left-field nominees last year in the form of The Creator and Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One . They pushed out expected contender Napoleon , which I think will happen again for Ridley Scott and Gladiator II . Best Production Design Locks Wicked The Brutalist Dune: Part Two Safe A Complete Unknown Nosferatu While it’s hard to glean much information from the Art Directors Guild nominations due to the many categories they employ, the combination of it with the CCA and BAFTA paints a pretty accurate picture. Of course, films like Conclave and Gladiator II are just as likely to make it in, so it’s hard to be fully convinced that this will be the final five. Best Costume Design Locks Wicked Dune: Part Two Shaky Conclave Nosferatu A Complete Unknown Wicked , Dune: Part Two , and Nosferatu were all mentioned by CCA, BAFTA, and the Costume Designers Guild. That leaves two spots left, which I’m giving to the surging A Complete Unknown and heavyweight player Conclave , both netting BAFTA nominations at the exact moment for them to translate to the Oscars. Best Makeup & Hairstyling Locks The Substance Wicked Safe Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Shaky A Different Man Emilia Pérez While most craft categories have steadily given more advantages to Best Picture players over the years, this category isn't afraid to be different. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice and A Different Man have highly visible work and were well represented across the various categories at the Make-Up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild. Also mentioned was Emilia Pérez , which continued a trend of that film getting mentions where you wouldn't immediately expect it to. Surprisingly, Nosferatu didn't receive a single nomination by the group, although that might have been largely due to timing as the film was released two weeks after the nominations were announced. Regardless, the aversion this branch has to horror makeup makes me hesitant to think it will get in. Best Visual Effects Locks Dune: Part Two Wicked Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes Safe Better Man Shaky Alien: Romulus Between Wicked , Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes , Better Man , and Gladiator II , 2024 was the year of the monkey. Being a Best Picture juggernaut secures Wicked 's spot, as does the overall strength of the Planet of the Apes series for Kingdom . Better Man features some extremely impressive work that is intertwined with the DNA of the film, so I think it stands a good chance. Gladiator II definitely had the highest quantity of effects of the bunch, but there were (valid) complaints that they weren't very good, leaving a spot open for something like Alien: Romulus . Best Animated Feature Locks The Wild Robot Flow Safe Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl Inside Out 2 Memoir of a Snail There hasn't been any movement within this category for months now, and no clear alternatives that could make a case for a surprise nomination. It's best to just set it and forget it, as there are so many more fish to fry. Best International Feature Locks Emilia Pérez (France) I'm Still Here (Brazil) Safe The Seed of the Sacred Fig (Germany) Shaky The Girl with the Needle (Denmark) Vermiglio (Italy) I've held onto these five titles for a while now, so I might as well stay the course and go down with the ship. The Girl with the Needle and Vermiglio performed very well at the European Film Awards and other industry precursors (both nominated at the Golden Globes and longlisted by BAFTA). Of course, so many films with pedigree and good stats have found themselves snubbed (I'm still crying about Decision to Leave ). I'll be on the lookout for Kneecap , which had a great showing at BAFTA and BIFA. Best Documentary Feature Safe No Other Land Sugarcane Shaky Black Box Diaries Daughters Will & Harper The absence of Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story on the shortlist illustrated yet another example of this branch's distaste for celebrity bio docs. While not exactly cut from the same cloth, one could assume that Will & Harper might suffer the same fate when it comes time to select the final five nominees. But the buzz has been great for the film, and it does much more than puff up a famous figure, so I think it squeaks in. The rest of the lineup is filled with more traditional contenders, with something like Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat being an alternate pick. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen

Three Thousand Years of Longing August 26, 2022 By: Button Hunter Friesen Resting somewhere between David Gordon Green and Steven Spielberg, Australian filmmaker George Miller ranks as one of our most chameleon filmmakers (to Miller’s benefit, he’s much closer to the latter than the former). Ranging from the harsh brutalism of the Mad Max quadrilogy to the familial wholesomeness of Babe: Pig in the City and Happy Feet , Miller’s career has never had a straight trajectory. Rather, it darts from one end of the cinematic spectrum to the complete other side, with the only consistent thing being that he always remains on the high side of quality. So naturally, when asked how he would describe his newest film, the first to follow his magnum opus of Mad Max: Fury Road , Miller called it “anti- Mad Max .” But fret not, all you War Boys (and girls)! For all of its intimacy and small scale, Three Thousand Years of Longing contains dazzling imagery and set pieces that make for an engaging cinematic experience. After all, this is still the same filmmaker who gave us a blind character that plays a flaming guitar atop a monster truck. Just as the title implies, our story spans nearly three millennia. Beginning in the present, acclaimed narratologist Dr. Alithea Binnie is on a work-related trip to Istanbul. By her definition, she’s a solitary creature that has no partner, no parents, and no children. She buries herself in her work, which includes giving lectures on how ancient civilizations would explain the phenomena of the universe through stories. As she puts it during one of her talks, “How else would you explain the changing seasons if you had no idea the Earth rotated around the Sun?” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWGvntl9itE Her fascination with stories leads her to purchase a less-than-stellar bottle at a local shop. “Whatever it is, it must have an interesting story, '' she explains as she takes it back to her hotel room. That turns out to be the understatement of the century, or, more accurately, the past three millennia. Quickly, the bottle is broken, and out comes a djinn, whose existence is based on granting three wishes to whoever frees him from the bottle. Now Alithea’s predicament revolves around the question everybody has asked themselves at least once in their lives: If you had three wishes, what would you wish for? To help Alithea (and the viewer) answer one of life’s hardest philosophical questions, the djinn regales his life story, which spans from ancient Arabia in the time of King Solomon to Suleiman the Magnificent's reign of the Ottoman Empire, all the way to the modern day. It’s no wonder what brought Miller to this short story by A.S. Byatt. Reportedly, he had read it in the ‘90s and was set on making it into a film, but the scope he wanted to achieve just wasn’t possible (a sentiment many filmmakers shared at the time). Miller’s patience was rewarded, with the final product being a gorgeous melding of visual effects and practical magic. Each of the djinn’s tales contains aspects of lust and betrayal, each more visually arresting than the last. It’s in these sequences that the film reaches its heights. And it’s not just Miller himself who is a chameleon; it’s also his production crew, which has been entirely reunited after the overwhelming success of Mad Max: Fury Road . Miller’s eye for popping visuals is wonderfully captured by legendary cinematographer John Seale, who announced this project as his final one (although Seale has as much respect for retirement as Daniel Day-Lewis, who came out of retirement for Mad Max: Fury Road , only to retire again and then return for this film). And then there’s Tom Holkenborg, who trades in his drum core for a passionate string orchestra. For all its extravagance on a technical level, Three Thousand Years of Longing still has overflowing emotion at its center. This is the part that Miller described the film as “anti- Mad Max .” Swinton and Elba carry the heartfelt moments with ease, even if the script itself can’t fully justify what direction it’s going in. A modern fairytale that is both epic and intimate, Three Thousand Years of Longing is a wildly original re-welcoming for George Miller, who brings the spirit and passion of a filmmaker much younger than him. It’s a story about the power of storytelling, with Miller playfully executing his role as the storyteller with all the tricks at his disposal. For any filmmaker of Miller’s age (nearing 80) and stature, one would think that he would treat this film as a starting point to make more smaller-scaled features. But Miller isn’t just any filmmaker, and it only seems natural that he’s currently in his native Australian Outback shooting Furiosa , the epic prequel to Mad Max: Fury Road. Amazon MGM Studios will release Three Thousand Years of Longing in theaters nationwide on August 26th. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

Alien: Romulus August 14, 2024 By: Button Hunter Friesen With each passing year, the meeting scene from The Matrix Resurrections gets more and more prescient. Focus group research, marketing trends, brand imaging, and keyword association are the tools of the trade nowadays, especially when you’re working with a franchise as long in the tooth as Alien . It’s not hard to imagine what was yuppied around the 20th Century corporate office when devising the concept for Romulus , which essentially serves as a grab bag of all the recognizable (and liked) aspects of the previous movies. It had to have a Xenomorph skulking around the pitch-black corridors of a steel-trap spaceship. It had to have a face hugger, which would eventually lead to someone’s chest bursting open. While people weren’t generally fans of Prometheus or Alien: Covenant , they did enjoy Michael Fassbender’s portrayal of a calculating android companion, so that also has to be an element. There also needs to be a woman in a tank top running around with a gun, and a bunch of crew members that become more expendable as the movie goes on. However enthusiastically co-writer/director Fede Álvarez goes about ticking off all these boxes on his studio-mandated to-do list, there is always the feeling that he’s bowling with the bumpers on. It’s hard to truly appreciate a strike (or, in this case, a modest spare) when the risk of rolling a gutter ball was never there to begin with. But after quite a few missteps in the nearly forty years since the original Alien and Aliens , the thought of “playing it safe” should come as no surprise. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzY2r2JXsDM There are also no surprises in the methodology Álvarez and co-writer Rodo Sayagues employ to move our central characters into the claustrophobic spaceship housing the most terrifying life form in the universe. Five young individuals have been born and raised in a mining colony, none of them ever laying eyes on the sun. Rain (Cailee Spaeny) and her android brother Andy (David Jonsson) have been continually denied permission to leave the planet on account of corporate greed and malfeasance. When a deserted station is found floating right above their heads by some of her fellow poverty-stricken friends, Rain reluctantly sees it as the escape opportunity she’s always been denied. From there, we discover that this station was not abandoned willingly, but taken over by force by an unknown killing machine. Production designer Naaman Marshall does an excellent job of recreating the cold interior through practical means, complete with enough tech to identify the extraterrestrial foe, but never enough to put it down for good. The leisurely pacing of the initial half instantly ramps up once blood and guts start spilling, with Álvarez leaning on his visceral skills from his 2013 Evil Dead remake to make you squirm in your seat. Bones crunch loudly as limbs become unattached, and creaks and groans occupy every corner of the ship as the aliens lurk around waiting for the perfect moment to strike. The thought of this original being planned for a Hulu release is almost as sickening, as no home could compare to the sensory-deprived fear you get from the cinema. For both good and bad reasons, “for the fans” would be the correct way to define the energy that Álvarez instills within every moment. Homages, callbacks, and blatant winks occupy much of the foreground and background, creating an unavoidable stench of desperation as the studio hopes your Pavlovian responses kick in at the sight of franchise favorites. A certain famous phrase is reintroduced for climactic effect, although the context of the moment instills more groans than cheers. The young cast hold their own against the decades-old trapping they’re up against. Spaeny has become one of the most dependable young actresses working today, with her work in Civil War marking quite the impressive double bill this year. While androids don’t figuratively possess a soul, Jonsson brilliantly finds the compassion necessary for Andy. He is, without a doubt, the highlight of the film, fully living up to the robotic work that Ian Holm and Michael Fassbender previously did within the franchise. Romulus doesn’t have the benefit of being ambitious, which is why it can count itself lucky for executing well on its surface-level objectives. Ridley Scott’s last two ventures into this universe may have been better for its overall health, but this provides the much-needed steroid for it to continue at all. 20th Century Studios will release Alien: Romulus in theaters nationwide on August 16th. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

Madame Web February 14, 2024 By: Button Hunter Friesen Sony has really outdone themselves this time. Venom was one of the worst movies of 2018, Venom: Let There Be Carnage was one of the worst movies of 2021, and Morbius was by far the worst movie of 2022. If Madame Web isn’t the worst thing I see in 2024, then God help us all. On one hand, I have to commend their consistency. But on the other hand, I have to ask if all these movies have just been some sort of sick joke, almost like an attempt at reverse psychology for us to hate Spider-Man. There’s no other explanation beyond that, because who in their right mind would give the green light to such low-tier characters (in the case of Morbius and Madame Web) and mess it all up on four consecutive occasions? Let’s just get this over with, shall we? Things begin in the Amazon as Cassie Web’s mother researches spiders just before she dies (sorry everyone, that memeified line isn’t in the final cut of the film). Ezekiel Sims (Tahar Rahim) has been hired to protect the very pregnant mother on her journey, but he backstabs her once she finds the elusive arachnid that grants powers to whoever it bites. It’s now thirty years later, and Sims has been continually having visions about three teenage girls (Sydney Sweeney, Isabela Merced, and Celeste O’Connor) killing him with their own superpowers. What would any sane person do in that scenario? Brush off these nightmares and carry on with their life? Move as far away as possible from the location of this predicted occurrence? Wrong! The correct answer is to track down these girls with stolen Patriot Act surveillance equipment and murder them first. It’s so simple! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_76M4c4LTo This is how Cassie (Dakota Johnson) gets tangled in this web, as her path has seemed fated to cross with those of the girls. Like Ezekiel, she too can see into the future (or travel back in time if you’re going off the incredibly incoherent editing), only she uses it to save lives. She’s not like other women, or people for that matter, as evidenced by one of the most awkward baby shower scenes to ever grace the screen. But that estrangement isn’t from her mysteriously uncontrollable power or the fact that she’s an orphan; it’s from the “so bad it’s almost hilarious” script by the four credited writers of Matt Sazama, Burk Sharpless, Claire Parker, and director S.J. Clarkson. Never has expository dialogue been so in demand, and a plot been so needlessly convoluted. None of this makes any sense once you step back and think about the chronology of events. Ezekiel wants to kill the girls because they will eventually gain superpowers, but the girls only get the powers as a byproduct of Ezekiel trying to kill them. So wouldn’t his trying to kill them first only be speeding up what’s going to happen? That paradox aside, the shoddy camerawork and special effects make it nearly impossible to comprehend what’s going on in the present. That might have been a public service in disguise, as the less you see and think about this film, the better. Johnson is an actress who can be great in the right roles, but also awful in the wrong ones. Her two films with Luca Guadagnino - A Bigger Splash and Suspiria - are part of the former, with this being as far down the latter as you can go. Never has a comic book casting been this misjudged, with her line deliveries and overall demeanor signaling her apathy about being part of this project. Sweeney’s characterization and wardrobe almost sexualize her more than Euphoria , with Merced and O’Connor doing little else to impress. The biggest injustice of the film might be its extraordinary ability to make Tahar Rahim look like a terrible actor, with the revered French arthouse performer rendered to ADR’d lines and boilerplate villainous speechifying. Madame Web might do more harm to spiders than birds themselves. Sony has reached the point of insanity by releasing the same bland product over and over again and expecting different results, and I’m right there with them for watching each one. We’ve still got Kraven the Hunter and Venom 3 this year, so this crazy train isn’t going to stop anytime soon. Sony Pictures Releasing will release Madame Web in theaters nationwide on February 14th. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

The Boy and the Heron September 8, 2023 By: Button Hunter Friesen It’s not a coincidence that Guillermo del Toro gave a brief message before the International Premiere of The Boy and the Heron, aka How Do You Live? . He repeated the motif he’s been (rightfully) banging since the promotional tour for his animated Pinocchio adaptation last year, that animation is not just a genre solely meant to panderously entertain children. “Animation is film, and tonight’s film goes beyond that. Animation is hard,” he said as he expressed his enthusiasm for the film and Hayao Miyazaki. The famed filmmaker has called it quits several times throughout his career, most notably in 2013 during the festival tour of The Wind Rises , an unconventional animated biopic on aeronautical engineer Jiro Horikoshi that also happened to investigate Miyazaki’s legacy. It was a fitting farewell, but the press-shy director couldn’t stay away, coming back for his truly final film. It’s a supportable decision, as The Boy and the Heron is Miyazaki’s most personal film, combining several elements of his upbringing as well as statements aimed straight at his audience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7EDFdA10pg Our titular boy is 12-year-old Mahito, who’s recently lost his mother to a 1943 Tokyo fire. His dad quickly marries her sister, much to Mahito’s disapproval. The titular heron is a gray heron that flies around the new stepmother’s house. It’s taken an interest in Mahito, and in typical Miyazaki fashion, is able to speak and sets him on a quest to different worlds. Forgive the vagueness, but I’d prefer to take the stance Studio Ghibli did with their marketing of the film and reveal as little as possible. There’s no point in going into detail about how beautiful The Boy and the Heron looks . It’s on the same level as Avatar and Gravity ; every possible way to articulate the visual sumptuousness doesn’t do enough justice. There’s the intangible feeling you get knowing that so much work and love was put into every frame. You let out a sigh of relief and know that you’re in the safe hands of a master. While it can be one of the film’s minor faults, Miyazaki’s methodical pacing is a breath of fresh air compared to the hyperactivity of most works within this genre. Balancing out some of the maximalist aspects of the visuals is Joe Hisaishi’s wondrous piano score, highlighting all the pain, joy, and everything in between that comes with Mahito’s journey. Miyazaki explores rather mature themes, offering lessons on life applicable to all ages. The boy’s fantastical journey, slightly similar to Chihiro’s from Spirited Away , is full of danger and intrigue at every turn. Animation is a medium that allows for endless possibilities, and Miyazaki is a filmmaker who pushes it to its most extreme boundaries. The question I always want to ask during a film is “What’s going to happen next?” So many movies don’t incite enough wonder for that question, nor do their answers provide the necessary satisfaction. The Boy and the Heron made me ask that question out loud more times than I can count, and each answer was filled with more passion than I could have hoped for. There are animated films for children, and there are animated films for adults. This is an animated film for everyone, and the world is a much better place because of it. One of the greatest, if not the greatest, figures in animation history has provided us with his swan song, and now it’s time for us to continue his legacy with the pieces left behind. This review was originally published from the international premiere at the 2023 Toronto International Film Festival. GKIDS Films will release The Boy and the Heron in theaters nationwide on December 8th. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

The Ballad of Wallis Island April 7, 2025 By: Button Hunter Friesen When The Barenaked Ladies performed their song “If I Had $1,000,000,” they mentioned that they would use the money to buy a house, a K-Car, a fur coat, exotic pets, and expensive ketchup. But what about a whole island? Well, that’s exactly what Charles (Tim Key) does in The Ballad of Wallis Island . Of course, you’d need a little more than a million dollars to do that. That’s no problem for Charles, as he won the national lottery not once, but twice. Yes, this slightly oafish man is one of the luckiest people in history. The proceeds from the first win were spent traveling the world with his wife, Marie. The money eventually ran out, but not before they filled their fridge door with magnets and postcards from every place on Earth. Charles decided to be a little more fiscally responsible with the second lump sum, buying a small, secluded island in the middle of nowhere and hunkering down there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTi-e20yVNs Charles is a massive fan of the folk duo Herb McGwyer (Tom Basden) & Nell Mortimer (Carey Mulligan). Unfortunately, the pair broke up nearly a decade ago, with McGwyer embarking on a solo career and Mortimer staying out of the music industry together. But there isn’t a problem that time (and a lot of money) can’t fix. Charles separately books them to perform on his island under the guise of an intimate private event for just a few fans. Like Lindsay Lohan’s parents in The Parent Trap , this comedy of errors leads Herb and Nell to reconcile the past and the present. However, this isn’t a Disney movie where everything works itself out in the end. The romantic ballads of Herb and Nell’s past came out of a real infatuation between the two. Basden and Mulligan are great together, the former putting up a tough exterior to hide the pain he feels for being a has-been, and the latter laying it all out on the table. There’s a constant will-they-won't-they dynamic at play, although the presence of Nell’s husband, Michael, kind of puts a damper on that. This feature is based on the 2007 short film The One and Only Herb McGwyer Plays Wallis Island , in which Basden and Key both starred and wrote. The duo wrote the feature as well, bringing the original short director James Griffiths along for the ride. There’s a calming reassurance that permeates through the whole thing that could only be bought from nearly fifteen years of care and affection by the creatives. Cinematographer G. Magni Ágústsson provides a warm texture to this charming run-down slice of paradise. Time has also been a double-edged sword for the creatives, with some poor ideas possibly not being killed simply because they had stuck around so long. Charles is lovable, yet has a habitual need to fill any moment of silence with words. It’s a humorous tick at first, but the fact that it’s trotted out nearly a dozen more times makes it immediately annoying. I wish more time had been spent on the dynamic between Nell and Herb, as their brief isolated moments are easily the most interesting parts of this story. Basden wrote nearly two dozen songs for the feature, a mixture of folk and rock. They aren’t exactly memorable, but there’s a soothing quality to them that invites you to agree with why someone like Charles would just want to live a quiet life with them as his soundtrack. The Ballad of Wallis Island is kind of like those songs, beckoning you to relax by the fire and gently search your soul. Focus Features will release The Ballad of Wallis Island in select theaters on March 28th. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

The Fall Guy May 1, 2024 By: Button Hunter Friesen “A love letter to stunt actors” has been the overused line to promote The Fall Guy , directed by former stuntman David Leitch, who’s now become a Hollywood action staple behind the camera ( Deadpool 2 , Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw, Bullet Train ). While it’s a true statement in the emotional sense, with Leitch obviously showing great respect and pride for the craft and people that make it happen, the actual events within the film, many of them using stunts in service of lame action set pieces, make it as much a love letter to stunt actors as Madame Web is to paramedics and The Batman is to detectives. There was an opportunity in the beginning for The Fall Guy to keep its sights set on those it so desperately wants to be paraded by, but Drew Pearce’s (writer of Hobbs & Shaw ) script always finds a way to take the road that’s been traveled by every other action blockbuster in this era. Things start with stuntman Colt Seavers (Ryan Gosling) working on the set of another major action vehicle for global superstar Tom Ryder (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). Stuntmen are supposed to be the invisible heroes, but Colt becomes the most famous one in the world after he’s in an accident that breaks his back. He becomes a loner, essentially leaving Jody (Emily Blunt) at the altar just as their relationship was starting to heat up. He eventually gets lured back years later to help save Jody’s blockbuster directorial debut, MetalStorm , which is essentially a cross of Mad Max and Dune if it were directed by Zack Snyder. Ryder is the star of the picture, but he’s gone missing, so Colt is brought in to perform the stunts and see the film get over the hump. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7jPnwVGdZ8 That premise alone should have been more than enough to carry this film. You’ve got romance with Gosling and Blunt sizzling up the screen with their will-they-won’t-they chemistry, and you’ve got action in the form of the stunt work, all of which impresses on a technical level. The early scenes of Gosling (or, to be correct, his stuntman) rolling over in simulated car crashes and being set on fire do make you appreciate the blood, sweat, and tears required by these brave people to create something out of nothing. It’s just a great shame that Pearce and Leitch decided to limit all that reality-based movie magic to the first act, instead focusing the large majority of the bloated runtime on a weak caper plot about what’s happened to Ryder. The producer of the film, Gail (Hannah Waddingham), has Colt look for him, which gets him mixed up with drug dealers and a horde of goons. A murder conspiracy and lots of shootouts and explosions ensue, yet none of it feels impressive as it continually inches closer to implausibility. Sure, it’s all part of the summer blockbuster fun, but it’s also hard to take this movie’s message about the realities of stunt work seriously when our protagonist is an indestructible superhero who surfs a highway on a shovel while dodging bullets, and the big stunt salute is just a poorly choreographed big-team brawl. Also feeding into the feelings of overindulgence is the now clichéd meta banter Gosling and Blunt frequently engage in. Both of them are great performers who have clearly shown their comedic chops (Gosling in Barbie , Blunt in The Devil Wears Prada ), but they’re not working with great material here. More often than not, a laugh comes from Gosling or Blunt oozing every bit of charisma they have to make it work, which also inversely makes other attempts at comedy feel oversold. The Fall Guy gets points for having its heart in the right place, but it also gets docked quite a few points by failing to put its money where its mouth is. There’s a hard, bland outer shell that prevents us from truly tasting the heartfelt inner core that Leitch thinks the movie is always tapping into. Summer movie season truly is back, but it’s unfortunately starting with more of a whimper than a bang. Universal Pictures will release The Fall Guy in theaters nationwide on May 03rd. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

Minions & Monsters June 30, 2026 By: Button Hunter Friesen Immediately trying to prove that its setting is its DNA rather than just window dressing, Minions & Monsters turns back the clock, opening with the Universal Studios logo from the silent film era. From there, we watch as the cute and chaotic yellow creatures appear in the earliest moving images: 1878’s Horse in Motion, 1896’s The Arrival of a Train by the Lumière brothers, and 1902’s A Trip to the Moon by Georges Méliès. As if you haven’t noticed across their seven feature films and hundreds of brand deals, the Minions have been, and will always be, around. Their signature brand of chaotic endearment has made them the secret saviors of the world. Throughout history, they’ve perpetually searched for the most evil person to serve under, which, one by one, they accidentally kill. They then move on to the next person, shaping the timeline in ways we could never fully imagine. Minions & Monsters does not continue the story of the trio of Kevin, Stuart, and Bob, who’ve been with the franchise throughout its entire existence. Instead, we’re introduced to a different tribe, specifically James and Henry, who still look the same and speak in their gibberish language, which is linguistically nonsensical yet fully coherent on an emotional level. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSdOwt-G49w After killing one too many bosses, these Minions eventually find themselves on the set of a 1920s silent film directed by one of those hoity-toity European directors (voiced by Christoph Waltz). Blazing their way around town, they bump into some of the era's greatest stars, such as Charlie Chaplin, Harold Lloyd, and Buster Keaton. In an industry that infamously disregarded workers’ safety, their indestructibility makes them the perfect stuntmen for Bright Brothers Pictures. Jeff Bridges voices both the hotheaded Frank and mellow Elwood in a send-up of the early days of Warner Bros. Pictures. While most of the Minions are only good at getting their heads bashed and creating a mess, James displays real filmmaking talent. However, right before he can get his big break and make an Oscar-winning film, the sound era arrives, requiring all performers to put away their slapstick routines and limber up their vocal cords. Not exactly the most eloquent bunch, the Minions quickly find themselves out of a job (although they would still be suitable actors for a Fellini film, as I never know what’s being said, even with subtitles). Knowing that special effects can cut through any language barrier, James and Henry decide that they should make a creature feature filled to the brim with monsters they can do battle with. As always, things don’t exactly go as planned, resulting in the pair summoning monsters who would rather destroy the world than star in a film. Admittedly, this is my first venture into the Despicable Me franchise since I saw the very first film as a kid back in 2010. The immense hyperactivity of this film had the kids in the audience bouncing off the walls after the screening, something a childless person like me isn’t overly ready to experience. But, as a film buff, the prospect of the Minions crashing Old Hollywood piqued my interest, and there were enough cameos, sight gags, and loving tributes to classic moviemaking that consistently had me grinning. As with any heavy dose of sugar, the crash eventually hits. Once the movies are replaced with monsters in the middle act, things get way too hectic, way too quickly. Knowing that they can only hold the attention of their young audience for about thirty more minutes, directors Pierre Coffin and Patrick Delage (the former also provides the voice for all the Minions) throw everything into the blender. That also includes a side plot about a Dort (Jesse Eisenberg), a humanoid robot who looks eerily similar to the one from The Day the Earth Stood Still , and Debbie (Zooey Duetch), an initially strong-willed suffragette who immediately bends over backward in love. A lot of butts are poked in this section where toilet humor reigns supreme. It’s that juvenility that often separates Illumination from the greater houses like Pixar and Studio Ghibli. But they know their audience and have no shame in playing down to them. And based on this mildly positive review and the enthusiastic reception the film got from everyone walking out under the age of twelve, I’d say this might be the strongest entry in this unstoppable franchise. Universal Pictures will release Minions & Monsters in theaters nationwide on July 01st. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

Every Spider-Man Movie Ranked June 2, 2023 By: Tyler Banark With Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse swinging into theaters this weekend, now is a perfect time to revisit and recap every movie from our friendly neighborhood superhero. Since the character’s big screen inception in 2002, Spider-Man has had many faces, friends, foes, and bosses thanks to a civil feud between Sony and Marvel. Between the Spider-Man actors - Tobey Maguire, Andrew Garfield, Tom Holland, and Shameik Moore - many generations of fans have debated over who is the best Spider-Man. However, that thorny question will be left for another day. Instead, we’ll embark on the equally difficult and exciting task of ranking all nine Spider-Man movies (Raimi trilogy, Amazing Spider-Man franchise, MCU trilogy, Into the Spider-Verse ) from worst to best. 9. Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) Yes, I admit that having Homecoming at the bottom of this list is an unpopular opinion. Tom Holland debuted as the MCU’s Spider-Man in Captain America: Civil War one year prior, with Homecoming being his first solo trip around the block. Homecoming is borderline okay, often pushing good. Indecisive on whether or not it wants to be a superhero movie or a John Hughes-inspired coming-of-age flick (i.e., The Breakfast Club, Sixteen Candles ), Homecoming struggles with its story and leaves audiences underwhelmed. Performance-wise, Holland and the supporting actors are finding their footing with mixed results. It does help that Robert Downey Jr. brings his usual veteran charm in his seventh outing Tony Stark. The other standout in the movie’s strongest suit is Michael Keaton’s Vulture, who packs both a threatening presence and justifiable motives. His turning out to be Liz’s dad was a surprise and one of the most shocking plot twists in the MCU. Thankfully, the fact that Homecoming isn’t as strong as the other Spider-Man movies isn’t a total hindrance, as its direct MCU sequels build upon it and eventually make Holland’s run better by progression. 8. The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) Before a recent rewatch, I always had a soft spot for The Amazing Spider-Man 2 . Although it wasn’t the best Spider-Man movie, I still found a lot to enjoy. However, the nostalgia has worn off, with the flaws being glaringly obvious. These big problems stem from the overcrowded writer’s room, with three new pens joining the only returning writer James Vanderbilt. The plot is overstuffed and the handling of the villains could’ve been better. The tone has also been drastically changed, although that change works out in the movie’s favor. Dane DeHaan could’ve been a solid Harry Osborn/Green Goblin, but he comes off as one-dimensional and his subplot is rushed. The same can be said for Jamie Foxx’s Electro, as it seems like he had to battle with the filmmakers/producers on how to pursue the character. These notes aside, TASM 2 still had some strong aspects to it. Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone have stellar chemistry, the ever-impressive Hans Zimmer delivers an excellent score, and the action sequences are incredibly staged, with the Times Square battle being the coolest moment in Garfield’s brief saga. 7. Spider-Man 3 (2007) If Garfield’s Spider-Man movies took any lessons from Raimi’s trilogy, it’s the unfortunate ability to mishandle a trio of villains. Harry’s long-gestating transformation into Goblin doesn’t bear the expected fruit as his final form only appears in two scenes, one of which is the final battle where he’s fighting Venom and Sandman alongside Spider-Man. Venom is introduced too late, with Topher Grace (poorly) replicating his hit character of Eric Forman from That 70s Show . Sandman is the only villain ingrained with a meaningful backstory and motives, both aided by Thomas Haden Church’s performance. I know it’s an unpopular opinion considering the memes that it spawned, but one of the best aspects of Spider-Man 3 is how it gives Peter an edgy side. Whether ironically or unironically, I think those misunderstood elements will become more appreciated as time goes on. Tobey Maguire still holds up as a more adult Peter/Spider-Man, with James Franco and Kirsten Dunst complimenting him as Harry Osborn and M.J., respectively. 6. Spider-Man 2 (2004) For the longest time, I thought Spider-Man 2 was the most overrated superhero movie ever. Don’t let your immediate anger cloud your judgment, as being overrated does not mean it’s bad. There’s a lot to love: Maguire and Dunst bring back their excellent chemistry, Alfred Molina’s menacing Doc Ock, Danny Elfman’s energetic score, and the Oscar-winning special effects. Raimi is also allowed to bring out his darker side by raising the stakes for Peter. He even creates one of the most horrifying scenes in a superhero movie, with the hospital scene still sending a tingle down my spine today. And then there’s the train sequence, which still holds up as one of the best cinematic Spider-Man set pieces. So why do I think this movie is overrated? Well, it’s because this sequel often feels like it’s trying too hard to replicate exactly what made its predecessor a huge success. If you think about it, Doc Ock has the same internal struggle as Willem Dafoe’s Green Goblin. And when Peter returns to being Spider-Man, he simply does it because MJ got kidnapped. There’s also the underdeveloped subplot of Aunt May's financial struggles and Peter’s academic decline. But for all my gripes, Spider-Man 2 is still a genuinely fun time. 5. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) Andrew Garfield’s first outing might be a little too familiar to Maguire’s, but it still has enough unique identifiers, such as the exploration of Peter’s parents and the handling of Peter as more of an outcast instead of a nerd, to justify its existence. This reboot still had its struggles with an inconsistent tone that goes from lighthearted fun to ominous at the flip of a switch. And it often becomes distracting as Garfield tries to replicate Maguire's humor while trying to be his version of the character. However, he does showcase great chemistry with Emma Stone’s Gwen Stacy, almost giving Maguire and Dunst a run for their money. Denis Leary stands out as Captain Stacy and Rhys Ifans’ Dr. Curt Connors/Lizard is an intimidating villain, even if he’s nowhere near the level of Dafoe's Goblin or Molina’s Doc Ock. His desire to create a world without weakness makes sense based on his situation, but his ends don’t justify the means. 4. Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019) Far From Home feels like your typical Spider-Man movie, which makes it serve as the perfect epilogue to the Earth-shattering events of Avengers: Endgame . Peter faces a great threat in Quentin Beck/Mysterio, with Jake Gyllenhaal being fantastic in the role as he finds room to make the character simultaneously understandable and egotistical. The chemistry between Holland and Zendaya continues to grow, with Jacob Batalon supplying the comic relief. It also never hurts to have Samuel L. Jackson appear as Nick Fury. FFH also has heaviness throughout as Peter still grieves over Tony’s death while struggling to live up to the status he expects of himself. The scene where Mysterio messes with Peter’s head through illusions is the perfect illustration of the character at his most frightening. Not once does it feel cheesy; it’s unnerving as we see a figure Peter trusted unleash his true colors. Had Peter’s story ended here, it would’ve been neat, but it ultimately sets the stage for a third chapter that will go down as the most iconic for Holland’s run thus far (hint, hint). 3. Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021) No Way Home is the pinnacle testament to Spider-Man as it honors the cinematic legacy that was created back in 2002. We find Holland’s Spider-Man still processing the weight of Tony’s death and developing an understanding of what it means to be a superhero. Fortunately, he finds two excellent teachers in those that have come before him as Maguire and Garfield return, along with their familiar foes. Their chemistry with Holland is undeniable, and it’s so satisfying to see the three of them interacting with each other. Bringing the first two Spider-Men back felt like a wave of nostalgia for lifelong fans of the character. But it’s not a simple cash grab as it works well with the grand scope of the narrative. Seeing Dafoe’s Goblin and Molina’s Doc Ock return is bittersweet as they act like not a day has passed since they last played their parts. Foxx’s Electro is given room to be the formidable opponent he wanted to be in TASM 2 . NWH would easily be in the top two, but the only thing holding it back is the heavy reliance on fan service, which doesn’t translate as well outside of the theater. Otherwise, it’s a perfect Spider-Man movie that encapsulates everything it means to be the character. 2. Spider-Man (2002) Spider-Man is a classic superhero movie with the right amount of stakes for the character both internally and externally. It laid the groundwork of what a Spider-Man movie could be so effortlessly, something that almost every other entry has been chasing. Maguire fits the bill as a nerdy Peter Parker grappling with his newly given powers to become the hero we know and love. Of course, I may be biased toward this movie since it is the original. But upon revisiting it recently, it’s still as flawless as when I first watched it. Sam Raimi always stood for changing the game just as he did for the horror genre with the Evil Dead trilogy, so there’s no surprise that he reapplies his methods to the still burgeoning superhero genre. Willem Dafoe is incredible as Norman Osborn/Green Goblin, nailing the two-face aspect of the character. James Franco and Kirsten Dunst deliver excellent turns as Peter’s friend Harry and love interest M.J., respectively, as does Rosemary Harris as Aunt May and J.K. Simmons as the wisecracking J. Jonah Jameson. The finale is also one of the best moments of any superhero movie, as we see Spidey flawlessly save M.J. and the Roosevelt Island tram. 1. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018) Into the Spider-Verse is not only one of the best superhero movies ever made, but it’s also one of the best-animated movies of the 21st Century. Here, we are introduced to Miles Morales, a middle schooler who is dealt the same fate as Peter and learns to become a hero. Only this time, he gets some help from other variations of the character spread across countless dimensions. Shameik Moore voices the role of Miles well, while Hailee Steinfeld and Jake Johnson counter him as Spider-Gwen and Peter B. Parker/Spider-Man. Daniel Pemberton’s score and the soundtrack bring their unique flare, matching well with the out-of-this-world animation. The utilization of different animation styles left no doubt as to why this won the Oscar for Best Animated Feature, or why it will continue to be the model for animation excellence for years to come. Whichever Spider-Man movie audiences prefer, there is no denying that all nine of them offer something different. No matter if they work or not, the movies made a statement about the character and illustrated where the superhero genre was at a moment in time. Tobey Maguire laid the groundwork; Andrew Garfield proved that you should never stand down even if the cards aren’t in your favor; Tom Holland captured the youthfulness and understood the duties of Spider-Man; and Shameik Moore proved that no one fights alone and anyone can wear the mask. But what do all four of these Spider-Men have in common? They have the understanding that with great power comes great responsibility. You can follow Tyler and read more of his thoughts on movies here . More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Hunter Friesen

Awards Update: The First Oscar Predictions of the Season June 13, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Welcome to an ongoing series where I cover the 2025/2026 awards season. On a regular basis, I will update my Oscar predictions, taking into account the new information that has been received since the last update. Full predictions in every category can be found on the Home and Awards page. The summer movie season is in full swing, packing the multiplexes with big blockbusters and nine-figure box office grosses. The warm winds also mean it's time to scratch the burgeoning itch that is the upcoming Oscar season through some early scouting and shot-in-the-dark predictions. Luckily, two of the major film festivals of the year, Sundance and Cannes, are in the books. The former featured little to no contenders beyond the usual smattering of documentaries, while the latter debuted a few seemingly strong contenders. As we've learned over the years from Parasite , Triangle of Sadness , Anatomy of a Fall , The Zone of Interest , The Substance , and Anora , to be a Best Picture contender born at Cannes, you must leave there with a prize in hand. That leads us to first look at this year's Palme d'Or winner: Jafar Panahi's It Was Just an Accident . As evidenced by the assortment of festival prizes, Panahi is a revered auteur in the cinephile sphere of influence. This victory was part of a natural progression for him. That momentum and the film's potent political messaging are the main ingredients that could bring it into the Best Picture race. However, there are also several drawbacks. Iran will certainly not be submitting it for Best International Feature, and coproducers France and Luxembourg have previously illustrated that they won't submit non-native films. This will also be a tough sell at the box office, with a low ceiling that might not be high enough to gather public momentum. Distributor Neon clearly has a lot on their plate, and were in a similar situation last year with the Iranian thriller The Seed of the Sacred Fig , which turned out to be an awards disappointment. The company has grown as a campaigner over the years, but it remains to be seen if it can handle pushing multiple films into the top categories. Between the reported 15-19 minute standing ovation, enthusiastic reviews, and headlining stars, Sentimental Value will be Neon's main priority. They bought the film at last year's Cannes Film Festival before production had commenced, so they've had their eggs in this basket for a while now. They also just announced the same mid-fall release date as Anatomy of a Fall and Anora , so there's little reason to doubt that it will be a major player. I expect it to appear at all the major fall festivals before then. From there, it’s hard to gauge how the other prize winners will perform. Rigorous features like Sirât , Sound of Falling , and Resurrection each received acclaim and were picked up by reputable distributors. They likely won't appear in any major Oscar categories, but could factor into the Best International Feature race, should they be submitted to compete. Leaving empty-handed was Die, My Love . The reviews were mixed-positive, with all praise going to Jennifer Lawrence's lead performance. That would normally be enough for an Oscar favorite like her, but it's difficult to predict a lone acting nomination for a film that will be quite hostile towards audiences. Mubi did part with a chunk of change for the distribution rights, so they'll be making a big effort to get the film recognized in more categories. Other than the already premiered films, the rest of the predictions are a patchwork of educated guesses. As a reminder, this phase is solely about the nomination. We won't be thinking about winners until the new year. At this time last year, I had Joker: Folie à Deux , The End , and The Piano Lesson in my Best Picture lineup, so everything here is written with pencil. TIFF already announced its opening night film ( John Candy: I Like Me ), so the fall festival train has already left the station and will be accelerating over the next few months. My next update will come later this summer once we have a clear picture of what will be competing. More Reviews Primetime September 22, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Unabomber September 24, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Look Back September 16, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen Elsinore September 14, 2026 By: Hunter Friesen