Search Results

The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part February 11, 2019 By: Button Hunter Friesen Back in 2014, The LEGO Movie had to overcome the enormous challenge of adapting a storyless toy brand into a compelling blockbuster. Through expert use of wit and charm, the film became a rightful smash hit that could be enjoyed equally among children and adults. And, for better or worse, it introduced the world to the incredibly memorable song “Everything is Awesome.” Opening exactly where the original left off, the Duplos have attacked Bricksburg and transformed the land into an apocalyptic Mad Max -like wasteland. Despite the darkness of the situation, Emmett maintains his cheery attitude, making him an outsider amongst the tougher community members. In the midst of an attack, Lucy is captured and taken to the Sistar System. With both his home and friends taken from him, Emmett sets out to save Lucy and become the tough guy he thinks he needs to be. Mike Mitchell takes over the directing chair from the original pair of Phil Lord and Christopher Miller. Mitchell doesn’t try to reinvent the wheel and very much stays in the same lane as the first film. He keeps the pace frenetic and is able to cram a large amount of story within a 106-minute runtime. This fast pace works well at keeping the jokes fresh, but it does wear the story thin near the beginning of the third act. Fortunately, the film quickly recovers and delivers a beautiful ending. Supporting the vast amount of set pieces and action sequences is some great animation that is slightly improved over the first film. Computerized effects are used in restraint in favor of more practical-looking effects. And even when used, the computer effects are creative and fit well within the story. Even though they passed on directing, Phil Lord and Christopher Miller returned as scriptwriters for this sequel. The pair proves yet again that they have a natural talent for witty dialogue that works best when it's able to parody itself. The script for this film closely resembles the first as it preaches the value of being yourself and accepting others. This retread of familiar material does strip the story of surprising moments, but the rapid-fire meta jokes about this fact make up for the conventionality. One thing this sequel does better than the original is flesh out the real-world story of the brother and sister that control what happens in the LEGO world. The addition of this element provides some touching moments that connect well with anybody who remembers having fights with their sibling over childhood toys. With both returners and newcomers, the voice cast does a great job at supplying the laughs and heart-tugging moments. Chris Pratt is exceptional as Emmett. His upbeat voice and ability to connect emotionally with the audience make him a fantastic leading character. Elizabeth Banks does a great job as Lucy, whose imprisonment forces her to look at a mirror and decide who she really is. Will Arnett is still perfect as Batman, who is still full of himself and offers hilarious material in a supporting role. Tiffany Haddish is the standout as Queen Watevra Wa’Nabi. Along with being uproariously funny, Haddish surprisingly lends her voice to some new songs, most notably “Gotham City Guys.” Five years after the original, The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part surpasses all expectations and captures lighting in a bottle again. With heart and humor to spare, this tale for all ages is yet another awesome experience that is able to take its small pieces and build something extraordinarily larger than life. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Cannes 2023 Recap June 1, 2023 By: Hunter Friesen The Cannes Film Festival, renowned for its celebration of the art of cinema, serves as an annual rendezvous for filmmakers, artists, and film enthusiasts from around the world. As the curtains drew back on the esteemed event, it bestowed upon us a plethora of remarkable films that pushed the boundaries of storytelling and left an indelible mark on our collective cinematic consciousness. In this article, I’ll embark on a captivating recounting of the thirteen films I saw in this year’s edition. From intimate character studies to sweeping epics, the selection was a testament to the diverse voices and visions that grace the silver screen. Each film presented its unique tale, captivating audiences with its artistic merits and thought-provoking narratives. 13. The Old Oak Painfully flat and oversimplified, Ken Loach and Paul Laverty’s umpteenth partnership spends way too much time speechifying instead of building characters. The message boils down to racism = bad, and it ends without resolving either the main plot or the secondary subplot. For someone as adept at social realism as Ken Loach, this is a glaring misfire that makes me worried if it will be his whimpering swan song. 12. Black Flies You might as well walk into this movie with a headache because you're going to get one five minutes in. You might as well not watch this movie if you're squeamish with blood and needles. You might as well not watch this movie if you want to watch interesting characters in an original story filled with ideas you haven’t seen before. You might as well not watch this movie. 11. Last Summer There’s nothing like climbing the steps of the Grand Théâtre Lumière at 7 am to watch a movie about an affair between a middle-aged woman and her teenage stepson. Infamous provocateur Catherin Breillat’s first film in a decade is not as button-pushing as her reputation or the plot summary would imply. Instead, it mutley looks under the surface at the psychological damage caused by the physical actions. 10. Banel & Adama I’ve always had a blind spot for African cinema, so I felt compelled to let this be a mini-introduction. Ramata-Toulaye Sy’s debut film is confidently produced, with striking images and a welcoming lesson of a slice of African culture. The story may be too simple even for its 80-minute runtime, but the building blocks are there for further bites at the apple. 9. A Brighter Tomorrow With his version of Bardo , Nanni Moretti provides a humourous meta-commentary on his personal and professional life, as well as the state of modern filmmaking, complete with discussions about the lack of auteurship and Netflix’s anonymous releases. While it may not be all that innovative or groundbreaking, it's still light and breezy enough to be a good time. 8. May December Grab your marshmallows and graham crackers because Todd Haynes is bringing the camp! I give major props to everyone involved in this production for their ability to keep the silliness of this story a secret. This is “trash” handled by masters of the craft, with Natalie Portman and Julianne Moore understanding the assignment. I'm hoping the Netflix acquisition will allow a new generation of cinephiles to be welcomed into the diverse world of Todd Haynes. 7. About Dry Grasses A runtime of 197 minutes is nothing unusual for Turkish Cannes all-star Nuri Bilge Ceylan, who fills his Chekovian dramedy with endless moments of beauty and frustration. It’s a film that definitely requires multiple watches to fully comprehend its ideas, but I don’t think this initial watch instilled the ambition needed to consider doing that. 6. Perfect Days Wim Wenders’ best narrative feature in decades is a lesson in the serenity of doing the mundane, and the bliss we could all achieve if we didn't overcomplicate everything we do. Similar to the recent Sight and Sound crowned Jeanne Dielman , it’s a story that sounds terrible on paper. And yet, its uber-simplicity does wonders to lull you into a state of meditation. For the best results, watch this on a calm summer day with some tea. 5. Anatomy of a Fall While Johnathan Glazer kept Sandra Hüller at a distance in The Zone of Interest , writer/director Justine Triet has front and center within her Hitchcockian courtroom drama. It may be missing something special that would have made me fall in love with it, but it still contains a densely layered mystery that keeps you guessing throughout its 150-minute runtime. 4. Firebrand Karim Aïnouz’s tale of Catherine Parr and Henry VIII may not contain much directorial flair (begging the question of why it was here in the first place), but the fiery (pun intended) performances by Alicia Vikander and Jude Law keep things smoldering (again, pun intended). Historians will have a field day with its inaccuracies, which allow for a nontraditional and modern approach to a story that has become more relevant in the centuries since. 3. Monster Hirokazu Kore-eda brings Rashomon into the modern age with Monster , a movie that is both more gentle and deadly than its title implies. For the first time in his career, the revered Japanese auteur doesn’t write the script, deferring that duty to Yûji Sakamoto. While I hope this separation of responsibilities doesn’t become a trend, Kore-eda crafts an endearing story about differing perspectives and the misconceptions we surround ourselves with. 2. Asteroid City At this point in his filmography, you’ve probably made up your mind about Wes Anderson. I’m somewhat of an apologist, with those instantly recognizable production qualities and whimsical tones being music to my ears (and eyes). Asteroid City is another healthy dose of what I’m come to love, with the bonus of seeing an auteur continue to find new ways to channel what they do best. Full Review 1. The Zone of Interest Sickening in the most calculated way possible, The Zone of Interest is Jonathan Glazer's ode to Stanley Kubrick. He answers the question of how evil can exist unchecked, holding all of your senses in a sterilized vice. Be sure to soak it all in during your first watch, because I doubt you'll ever want to view the world this way again. Full Review More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Final 2025 Oscar Nomination Predictions January 21, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen We’re finally here! After months of festivals, box office results, and precursor awards, it’s finally time to put the chips down on who will find themselves in the Academy’s good graces. Things are much more chaotic compared to last year, where you could place Oppenheimer , Killers of the Flower Moon , Poor Things , and Barbie into nearly every category and come out with a decent record. This all leads me to my most important lesson of Oscar prognosticating: You have to go in with the mindset that you’re going to get 25% of your predictions wrong. The top score over at GoldDerby for last year’s nominations was around 80%. I like to go in with the same mindset I have for golf; which is not to make the most great shots, but to make the least bad ones. A gutsy shot tends to backfire more than it succeeds, which doesn’t bode well in a game where every shot counts. What does that mean here? It means not trying to overcomplicate things, and focusing your attention only on what’s needed. Go with the logical picks that favor the probabilities, and only go out on a limb for something you really feel is going to hit. As a focus tool, I’ve devised each category into three levels of likelihood for a nomination: Locks, Safe, and Shaky. Here’s a breakdown of how those categories are defined: Locks are virtually guaranteed to get a nomination. They’re more focused on winning the Oscar, with the nomination only being a formality. The only time you should spend on them is what it takes to write their names down on your predictions. A lock being snubbed is cause for headlines, and that’s something you can’t predict. Safes seem very likely to happen, and a snub would be a major talking point. They’ve hit pretty much every precursor they could, and have displayed support from the voting body. But there might be a hiccup in their campaign or a nagging feeling that there’s reason for doubt. Someone like Viola Davis in The Woman King fits this description. She was nominated at every precursor and is a titan in the industry. But the film just wasn’t landing in other categories, which led her to lose steam. Shaky is where you find a group of people fighting for those spots. They’ve hit some places and missed others, or their work goes against what the branch tends to favor. They might also have legitimate reasons for being a surprise nomination or a not-so-surprising snub. Something I’ve leaned away from in recent years is stats. There are just way too many variables at play: voter demographics, voter quantity, precursors influence, Academy rules, cultural sentiment, etc. It’s like debating if Magic Johnson or Steph Curry had a better NBA career. How can you compare two players who played in totally different eras and wildly different styles of play? Stats are helpful in some cases, but they should rarely be used as the primary justification for a prediction. As a matter of transparency, I will not be predicting the three short categories: Live-Action Short, Animated Short, and Documentary Short. It’s a fool’s errand to try and provide analysis for a category where I’ve seen none of the contenders and has no precursors to guide the way. I’ll just be going with the GoldDerby consensus. Without further ado, let’s get started! Best Picture Locks Conclave Emilia Pérez The Brutalist Anora Wicked Safe A Complete Unknown The Substance Dune: Part Two Shaky A Real Pain Nickel Boys Sing Sing has exemplified the "we're so back / we're so cooked" theme all season. It's done well at the smaller bodies, only to slip up once the lights get brighter. But it still has nominations for Adapted Screenplay and Lead Actor locked up, which lends just enough support to it holding on. But that PGA nomination for A Real Pain was a huge shot in the arm to go along with Kieran Culkin’s dominance, and Nickel Boys is still one of the most acclaimed films of the year. Unfortunately, I have to kick Sing Sing out, something I didn’t think was possible as I had it as a potential Best Picture winner just a few months ago. Best Director Locks Brady Corbet (The Brutalist) Jacques Audiard (Emilia Pérez) Safe Sean Baker (Anora) Edward Berger (Conclave) Shaky Coralie Fargeat (The Substance) The director’s branch of the Academy is only rivaled by the Documentary Feature branch in terms of being insular and having its own rules of who gets in and who doesn’t. It’s one of the few categories where you can semi-logically predict a snub for someone who has hit every precursor, or a surprise nomination for someone who hasn’t appeared anywhere else. Although Edward Berger didn't make it in for All Quiet on the Western Front despite that film's overwhelming dominance, he's firmly been promoted from outsider status and has an even bigger Best Picture contender with Conclave . The last spot seems to be between Coralie Fargeat and RaMell Ross, with the former having both the stats (GG, CCA, and BAFTA nominations) and momentum to back her up. Ross may not have either of those, but what he accomplishes in Nickel Boys is exactly the type of auteur-driven work that this branch admires. He would be following in the footsteps of Ruben Östlund and Jonathan Glazer, both of which got in when the stats said that they should be counted out. Best Original Screenplay Locks Anora (Sean Baker) The Brutalist (Brady Corbet & Mona Fastvold) A Real Pain (Jesse Eisenberg) Safe The Substance (Coralie Fargeat) Shaky September 5 (Tim Fehlbaum & Moritz Binder) We likely have three films vying for one final slot: All We Imagine as Light , Hard Truths , and September 5 . The PGA nomination for September 5 illustrated that it has the most legitimate shot at a Best Picture nomination of the trio, which pretty much gets it in by default. I would have had a tougher time choosing it over All We Imagine as Light if Payal Kapadia’s film hadn’t had such an unexpectedly lackluster at the BAFTA nominations. Of course, I would not be surprised if Mike Leigh got in instead for Hard Truths , which would be his sixth career nomination in the category. But he wasn't even longlisted by his hometown BAFTA, putting a big dent in those hopes. Best Adapted Screenplay Locks Conclave (Peter Straughn) Safe Emilia Pérez (Jacques Audiard) A Complete Unknown (James Mangold & Jay Cocks) Nickel Boys (RaMell Ross & Joslyn Barnes) Sing Sing (Greg Kwedar & Clint Bentley) It’s been a bit of a struggle to predict the other four nominees who will eventually lose to Conclave . As I mentioned in the Best Picture category, I had Sing Sing as a cinch to win here a couple of months ago, and now I’m wondering if it stays in. Granted, there isn’t that much competition for the final slot, so I might as well see it all the way through. Best Lead Actor Locks Adrian Brody (The Brutalist) Timothée Chalamet (A Complete Unknown) Ralph Fiennes (Conclave) Colman Domingo (Sing Sing) Safe Daniel Craig (Queer) We've been working with the same group of five men for months now. None of them have wavered, even when they were supposed to (Craig making it in at SAG was truly shocking). Sebastian Stan is the next closest contender, but for which film? The Apprentice did well at BAFTA, and he just won a Golden Globe for his performance in A Different Man . With that kind of intense vote splitting, it's hard for me to make a case for him. Best Lead Actress Locks Karla Sofía Gascón (Emilia Pérez) Mikey Madison (Anora) Demi Moore (The Substance) Shaky Cynthia Erivo (Wicked) Fernanda Torres (I’m Still Here) While the leading men have been sitting comfortably for months, the leading ladies have been thrown into chaos at every precursor. It feels like we've settled on a pretty sturdy set of four nominees, with that last slot being a bloodbath. There have only been two instances in the entire history of the Golden Globes where the winner of Best Lead Actress - Drama wasn't nominated at the Oscars. The first was because of a three-way tie in 1988 between Jodie Foster, Shirley MacLaine, and Sigourney Weaver (MacLaine was not Oscar-nominated), and the second was in 2008 when Kate Winslet won the Globe for Revolutionary Road, only for her to be nominated (and eventually) win in lead at the Oscar for The Reader . This year's winner, Fernanda Torres, gave a wonderful speech and appeared in a beloved movie with many passionate fans. She's still in the bubble because the Globes have been the only place she's shown up at, not even being longlisted by BAFTA. On the other hand, the Globes have been the only place that Marianne Jean-Baptiste has missed (she technically missed SAG, but that was never going to happen), which includes a historic trifecta of victories at NYFCC, LAFCA, and NSFC. Whoever misses between them, it's going to be unprecedented. And even with all that being said, there are still heavyweights like Nicole Kidman and Angelina Jolie. Neither of them has performed that well throughout the precursors, but you can never fully write them off. Best Supporting Actor Locks Kieran Culkin (A Real Pain) Safe Guy Pearce (The Brutalist) Edward Norton (A Complete Unknown) Shaky Yura Borisov (Anora) Jeremy Strong (The Apprentice) Similar to the Best Adapted Screenplay, we're finding four other nominees who will eventually lose to Kieran Culkin. Denzel Washington can get in on name alone (looking at you Roman J. Israel, Esq. ), but his miss at SAG was a little puzzling, and BAFTA was never going to help him (he’s still yet to receive a single acting nomination from them). The ascendancy of Yura Borisov has been one of the biggest stories of the season, and he's gotten in everywhere he could at this point. And then there’s Jeremy Strong, who found his way in after getting both a SAG and BAFTA nomination right as Oscar voting was starting. Best Supporting Actress Locks Zoe Saldaña (Emilia Pérez) Ariana Grande (Wicked) Safe Isabella Rossellini (Conclave) Shaky Felicity Jones (The Brutalist) Jamie Lee Curtis (The Last Showgirl) This is the toughest acting category to predict, with Saldaña and Grande being the only names that will appear on everyone's prediction sheets. Isabella Rossellini feels pretty safe for Conclave . Her missing SAG wasn't great, but she's an industry legend, has enough other precursor support, and appears in a big Best Picture player. The same can be said for Felicity Jones (minus the legend part). I've leaned into The Substance in every other above-the-line category, but Margaret Qualley just hasn’t shown up where she’s needed to. She’s been losing lately to Jamie Lee Curtis, who we’ve learned is one of the most beloved figures in Hollywood. And she’s an excellent campaigner, so good that I just can’t bet against her. Danielle Deadwyler would also make a lot of sense after her SAG revitalization. But we already went down this road with her a few years ago for Till. Could we see a repeat, or will voters make sure this doesn't happen again? Best Cinematography Locks The Brutalist Safe Nosferatu Shaky Conclave Dune: Part Two Maria Last year’s nomination for El Conde showed that Edward Lachmann only needs an ASC nomination to have a legitimate chance of breaking into this category, which bodes well for Maria . The rest of this lineup appeared at both the BAFTA and ASC nominations, pretty much securing their spot here. We’ve known for a while that this branch has a fetish for black-and-white, so I wouldn’t be surprised if The Girl with the Needle were to sneak in. Best Film Editing Locks Conclave Safe Emilia Pérez Anora Shaky Dune: Part Two September 5 Although this category tends to be filled with top-tier Best Picture contenders, The Brutalist finds itself on the outside looking in because of its startling omissions from ACE and BAFTA. It could still get in based on pedigree, pushing out fringe contenders like Dune: Part Two and September 5 . And then there are even films like Challengers and The Substance that showed up at ACE. Best Original Score Locks The Brutalist Conclave Emilia Pérez Safe The Wild Robot Shaky Challengers It's only been a few years since Justin Hurwitz won the Golden Globe Award for Original Score for First Man , only to be totally snubbed by the Oscars. That means this year's winners Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross ( Challengers ) can't go into nomination morning feeling confident, especially since they were also not longlisted by BAFTA. But they're aided by the fact that there isn't a clear alternative to them. If it had to be someone, I'd look out for branch favorite Alberto Iglesias, who scored Pedro Almodóvar's The Room Next Door and was nominated for their previous collaboration for Parallel Mothers . Best Original Song Locks El Mal (Emilia Pérez) Mi Camino (Emilia Pérez) Kiss the Sky (The Wild Robot) Safe The Journey (The Six Triple Eight) Shaky Harper and Will Go West (Will & Harper) There are three things that are certain in life: Death, taxes, and Diane Warren getting an Oscar nomination. She's on 15 career nominations… with no wins. The Six Triple Eight is a blockbuster compared to the films she's gotten nominated for over the past few years (has anyone watched Tell It Like a Woman?). "Compress/Repress" got in at both the Golden Globes and CCA, so it would make sense to have it take that last slot. But I’m going to throw a bit of a curveball in the form of a documentary song, which this branch tends to favor. Best Sound Locks Dune: Part Two Wicked Emilia Pérez Safe A Complete Unknown Shaky Alien: Romulus Alien: Romulus was shortlisted in quite a few categories, so it would make sense for it to get a nomination somewhere. We had left-field nominees last year in the form of The Creator and Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One . They pushed out expected contender Napoleon , which I think will happen again for Ridley Scott and Gladiator II . Best Production Design Locks Wicked The Brutalist Dune: Part Two Safe A Complete Unknown Nosferatu While it’s hard to glean much information from the Art Directors Guild nominations due to the many categories they employ, the combination of it with the CCA and BAFTA paints a pretty accurate picture. Of course, films like Conclave and Gladiator II are just as likely to make it in, so it’s hard to be fully convinced that this will be the final five. Best Costume Design Locks Wicked Dune: Part Two Shaky Conclave Nosferatu A Complete Unknown Wicked , Dune: Part Two , and Nosferatu were all mentioned by CCA, BAFTA, and the Costume Designers Guild. That leaves two spots left, which I’m giving to the surging A Complete Unknown and heavyweight player Conclave , both netting BAFTA nominations at the exact moment for them to translate to the Oscars. Best Makeup & Hairstyling Locks The Substance Wicked Safe Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Shaky A Different Man Emilia Pérez While most craft categories have steadily given more advantages to Best Picture players over the years, this category isn't afraid to be different. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice and A Different Man have highly visible work and were well represented across the various categories at the Make-Up Artists & Hair Stylists Guild. Also mentioned was Emilia Pérez , which continued a trend of that film getting mentions where you wouldn't immediately expect it to. Surprisingly, Nosferatu didn't receive a single nomination by the group, although that might have been largely due to timing as the film was released two weeks after the nominations were announced. Regardless, the aversion this branch has to horror makeup makes me hesitant to think it will get in. Best Visual Effects Locks Dune: Part Two Wicked Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes Safe Better Man Shaky Alien: Romulus Between Wicked , Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes , Better Man , and Gladiator II , 2024 was the year of the monkey. Being a Best Picture juggernaut secures Wicked 's spot, as does the overall strength of the Planet of the Apes series for Kingdom . Better Man features some extremely impressive work that is intertwined with the DNA of the film, so I think it stands a good chance. Gladiator II definitely had the highest quantity of effects of the bunch, but there were (valid) complaints that they weren't very good, leaving a spot open for something like Alien: Romulus . Best Animated Feature Locks The Wild Robot Flow Safe Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl Inside Out 2 Memoir of a Snail There hasn't been any movement within this category for months now, and no clear alternatives that could make a case for a surprise nomination. It's best to just set it and forget it, as there are so many more fish to fry. Best International Feature Locks Emilia Pérez (France) I'm Still Here (Brazil) Safe The Seed of the Sacred Fig (Germany) Shaky The Girl with the Needle (Denmark) Vermiglio (Italy) I've held onto these five titles for a while now, so I might as well stay the course and go down with the ship. The Girl with the Needle and Vermiglio performed very well at the European Film Awards and other industry precursors (both nominated at the Golden Globes and longlisted by BAFTA). Of course, so many films with pedigree and good stats have found themselves snubbed (I'm still crying about Decision to Leave ). I'll be on the lookout for Kneecap , which had a great showing at BAFTA and BIFA. Best Documentary Feature Safe No Other Land Sugarcane Shaky Black Box Diaries Daughters Will & Harper The absence of Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story on the shortlist illustrated yet another example of this branch's distaste for celebrity bio docs. While not exactly cut from the same cloth, one could assume that Will & Harper might suffer the same fate when it comes time to select the final five nominees. But the buzz has been great for the film, and it does much more than puff up a famous figure, so I think it squeaks in. The rest of the lineup is filled with more traditional contenders, with something like Soundtrack to a Coup d'Etat being an alternate pick. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark

The Little Things February 4, 2021 By: Button Hunter Friesen The serial killer genre once was the biggest attraction at the cinema. The Silence of the Lambs (winner of Best Picture), Se7en and American Psycho ruled the box office and were made on big budgets with big stars. With prestige television shows like True Detective and Mindhunter taking up space in the genre, films shifted towards low budgets and horror, which can be seen in Saw and the rebooted Halloween franchise. As one of the first cinematic releases of 2021, Warner Brothers is offering to take us back with The Little Things . Our story opens in 1990 Los Angeles as disgraced police detective Joe Deacon (Denzel Washington) returns to his old precinct. Immediately, he’s sucked into a developing case led by young hotshot Jim Baxter (Rami Malek) that contains similar patterns to the case that destroyed his career many years ago. Young women are being followed to their homes and then stabbed to death by a sadistic killer. The prime suspect is a grimy crime buff named Albert Sparma (Jared Leto). Sparma may look and talk the part of a killer, but there’s no evidence to link him to the murders. In order to stop the killings they suspect he’ll do, Deacon and Baxter race against the clock to gather evidence in a city ravaged by fear. There’s a line in the trailer, and also in the movie, that has stuck with me. At one point Deacon says that “it’s the little things that rip you apart and it’s the little things that get you caught”. While he’s describing how to cover up a murder, those same words can be said about making a movie. It’s the little things like character development, an engaging plot, and a satisfying ending that can rip apart this type of movie. These are the little, or in this case, big things that hold The Little Things back from reaching the heights of its predecessors. Writer/director John Lee Hancock, who’s had an average career with films such as The Blind Side and Saving Mr. Banks is the one to blame for this hollowness. Hancock, for the most part, has written and directed his films, which signifies a certain amount of uniqueness. Similar to Denzel’s quote, I was also struck with the question of what exactly is a John Lee Hancock film? That question can be answered for many writer/directors like Quentin Tarantino, Woody Allen, or Kevin Smith. But for Hancock, there isn’t something special he brings to the table. He doesn’t have a style or any original substance. His films are no different than the usual made-by-committee studio fodder. To give him the benefit of the doubt, he does bring above-average craftsmanship with cinematography and can carry a tense mood for most of the picture. But he still makes the unforgivable sin of delivering a shockingly underwhelming ending to a whodunit mystery. Hancock’s missteps also bleed into the central performances. As one of the best actors of a generation, Denzel Washington is incapable of doing wrong, which is why I’m only partially blaming him for his work here. There is a property in mathematics that stipulates that the product of any number multiplied by zero is zero. So, in the film’s case, with the character of Joe Deacon having zero-depth, the amount of work Denzel puts into his performance does not matter. He must have known this fact on set as he seems to be on autopilot and just doing a job for a paycheck. While Denzel knows he’s too good for this material, Rami Malek proves he isn’t good enough. His performance here is inconsistent, leaning too hard on the eccentricities and genre tropes of the rookie cop who hasn’t tasted defeat yet. His Oscar win in 2018 for playing Freddie Mercury in Bohemian Rhapsody is looking worse with each subsequent role. As Sparma, Jared Leto is his best in years, even though that is an incredibly low bar since he’s been nothing short of embarrassing since his 2013 Oscar win. Leto is fully hamming it up with his long greasy hair, odd mannerisms, and overall creepy demeanor. It may not be the most nuanced performance, but it sure is the most entertaining, which is worth something in this case. While The Little Things may amount to little, it’s still a harmless return to the bigger-budget serial killer dramas of yesteryear. In a time of year when there are fewer new releases, easy entertainment isn’t the worst thing in the world. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Violent Night November 30, 2022 By: Button Hunter Friesen Do you remember that Saturday Night Live sketch from 2019 where they took the cast of Sesame Street and imagined what they would be like in the world of Todd Philip’s Joker ? If you don’t, here’s the link to it. Go ahead and watch it and come back to this review. I won’t mind. In that sketch, David Harbour, who was hosting that week, plays the human version of Oscar the Grouch, making fun of Hollywood’s new incessant need for “dark and gritty” adaptations of beloved characters. Seeing a dark version of Sesame Street is fun for a couple of minutes, but we all know there’s only so much that can be done with that ironic concept. I just wish the producers for Violent Night had come to that realization before they decided to make a 100-minute “edgy” take on Santa Claus. Of course, along with an overall rise in darkness in blockbuster filmmaking (and society as a whole, but I’m not going down that meme-ified road), a violent Santa movie shouldn’t be all that surprising given the uptick in classical icons being presented their own dark stories filled with blood and crude language. The filmmakers behind the upcoming Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey have already announced their next feature to be Bambi: The Reckoning , which will see Bambi become “a vicious killing machine” after the death of his mother. These Asylum-level adaptations sound, and will probably be pure garbage. But they’ll make a quick buck purely based on the surface-level irony they create, even though you can get the same amount of enjoyment in much less time through the countless amateur YouTube videos out there. But, even with all the lumps of coal I received from Violent Night , the one thing I can certainly claim as a gift is David Harbour’s committed performance to the bit of playing a Santa that knows how to kick ass and slam down more drinks than Billy Bob Thornton in Bad Santa . His version of Santa is fed up with the greediness of our modern world, always wanting to get more rather than appreciate what we have. On one of his several billion stops on Christmas Eve, Santa becomes stranded in the mansion of Gertrude Lightstone (Beverly D’Angelo, cast for the chuckle you’ll give after remembering she’s in the MUCH better National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation ). The Lightstone family is being held hostage by a terrorist group led by Scrooge (John Leguizamo) who wishes to rob Gertrude of the $300 million in cash in her vault. Santa must become the John McClane of this story, using a bit of Christmas magic to punish those that are on the naughty list. Norwegian director Tommy Wirkola has already become accustomed to this unique subgenre where subversion of initial expectations is the selling point. His two Dead Snow films saw a group of young adults fight a recently risen division of Nazi zombies, and Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunter had the fairytale twins do a lot more damage than just stuffing witches in ovens. Even if he was the right person for the job, Wirkola can’t find anything interesting about this concept other than just seeing Santa beat some goons to a bloody (and snowy) pulp. The first action scene is funny enough, especially with it nearly all taking place in one extended take, showcasing Santa’s inexperience at this sort of thing. But subsequent set pieces leave a lot to be desired, often taking place in dim lighting and rapidly edited to a jolly holiday tune. And writers Pat Casey and Josh Miller think that there's a direct correlation between the number of curse words in your movie and how funny it is. There’s also an extreme overabundance of Christmas puns and wordplay, almost rivaling Batman & Robin for levels of groan-worthy dialogue. I probably come across as a Grinch with this review, but Violent Night did nothing to bring me yuletide cheer. It desperately wants to be the Christmas movie your weird uncle tells the whole family about at dinner but does nothing to achieve that beyond doing the bare minimum that we expect. Ho ho... no. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

The Fantastic Four: First Steps July 24, 2025 By: Button Hunter Friesen Simply by following an unreleased and illegal 1994 production from low-budget maestro Roger Corman, two so-so entries from the mid-2000s starring a pre-Captain America Chris Evans as Johnny Storm, and an embarrassing 2015 reboot that now mostly survives as a piece of mockery, The Fantastic Four: First Steps is… fantastic. Look, I knew I had to use that pun at least once throughout this review, so it made sense to get it out of the way. Beyond just the simple humor of the word play, it’s an apt description for this fourth official introduction to Marvel’s first family. In the thirty-seven entries of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, there hasn’t been a film that has committed more to the bit than First Steps . Even the opening IMAX and studio logos are dressed with the retrofuturist space-age design akin to The Jetsons . On this version of Earth, specifically called Earth-828 (the rest of the MCU takes place on Earth-616), live The Fantastic Four. In a quick television special montage, we get their backstories, the origin of their superpowers, and their newfound purpose as protectors. They’re Earth’s mightiest heroes, with the public adoring them for their friendly neighborhood charm and upstanding morals. It was nice to see that director Matt Shakman and screenwriters Josh Friedman, Eric Pearson, Jeff Kaplan, and Ian Springer share our sentiment about pushing past all the cursory facts that we’ve had over sixty years to study. Shakman helmed all episodes of WandaVision , everyone’s favorite pandemic comfort watch. His knack for mixing the stylistic influences of classic and modern television is mimicked here, with the art direction, costuming, and soundtrack greatly supporting the notion that this marks a new, separate entry in the MCU. The Thing casually walks around in a trench coat and fedora, with the rest of the team donning fashionable turtlenecks as their official uniform. The group’s robot butler, H.E.R.B.I.E., is an analog computer with artificial intelligence, zooming around a bit like WALL-E, making beeps and blips as comic relief. Through their mixture of brains and brawn, the Fantastic Four have been able to vanquish every threat that has come their way. That is, until the Silver Surfer (Julia Garner) arrives with a warning that this Earth has been marked for death by Galactus (Ralph Ineson), the unstoppable god-like destroyer of worlds. His introduction feels plucked straight out of the concept art, with his sheer size and superior tone reminding these heroes that they are mere mortals. Initially, First Steps makes the refreshing decision not to devolve into an endless punch fest, or a fetch quest for the MacGuffin that will stop the threat from happening. This is not an action-packed movie, as it largely relies on its characters to carry our interest. The well-cast actors accomplish this task with ease. The internet may have officially deemed Pedro Pascal as overexposed (he can currently also be found in theaters with Materialists and Eddington ), but that doesn’t mean his popularity amongst casting agents is unwarranted. His version of Reed Richards takes the blame for the group acquiring what he refers to as ‘anomalies,’ and is frightened by the fact that his status as the smartest man on the planet isn’t enough to outthink the doom that Galactus brings. There’s also the impending addition of a new member to the family in the form of a baby with wife Sue. Vanessa Kirby affectingly portrayed birth and motherhood in real-time in Pieces of a Woman , making this version merely a walk in the park. Joseph Quinn and Ebon Moss-Bachrach supply the best interpretations of Johnny Storm and The Thing, respectively. Each punches above their weight class when compared to the material handed to them, notably with the latter actor having to push through the barrier of motion capture performing. Of course, things do end with a variation on the giant sky beam, and there are just as many shoddy special effects shots as good ones. The Incredibles retains its title as the best version of this general concept. We’d have to dive into a thorny chicken-and-egg scenario to define who’s copying from whom. Still, that’s an incredibly high bar to clear, and this valiant effort is worth commending, especially with this serving as one of the final stepping stones until Avengers: Doomsday . More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever November 9, 2022 By: Button Hunter Friesen To paraphrase James Cromwell’s Captain Dudley Smith from L.A. Confidential : “I wouldn't trade places with Ryan Coogler for all the whiskey in Ireland.” Just on a purely basic level, the bar for the sequel to the box office smash / Oscar-winning / pop culture phenomenon that was Black Panther was almost insurmountable. Add in the untimely death of lead star Chadwick Boseman and the overall decline in reception to the preceding bunch of Phase Four, and you’ve got yourself a recipe for an anxiety attack. To Coogler’s credit, he makes a valiant effort to craft something unique out of his unfortunate situation. It’s just that his efforts didn’t turn into results, with Black Panther: Wakanda Forever feeling more like MCU entry #30 rather than a distinct work by a talented filmmaker. Just as Boseman is tragically gone from this world, so is King T’Challa from the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The film opens with Shuri (Letitia Wright) unsuccessfully attempting to cure her brother of an unknown illness. She blames herself for his death, leaving her unable to properly grieve the loss. With Wakanda stripped of its chief protector, the superpowers of the world see an opportunity to seize their coveted vibranium resources, leading to hostile relations for Queen Ramonda (Angela Bassett) to deal with. But, as it turns out, vibranium is not solely located within Wakanda. It’s also found near the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean thanks to a detector built by MIT student and overall wunderkind Riri Williams (Dominique Thorne). Unbeknownst to all, the underwater civilization of Talokan, led by the ankle-winged (an objectively silly concept) Namor, has observed the surface world for centuries and treats their underwater vibranium excursions as the straw that breaks the camel’s back. Namor wishes for Wakanda to join him on his crusade, but his request is swiftly denied. Knowing that the Wakandan forces are the only ones powerful enough to stop him, he wages war on the briefly vulnerable kingdom. The premise of Wakanda Forever is awfully by-the-numbers, especially when compared to its ever-interesting predecessor. The complex arguments from Michael B. Jordan’s Killmonger have been replaced by surface-level (pun intended) anecdotes about how “humans are bad” by Namor, who falls far down the MCU villain power rankings. It also doesn’t help that his motives and the design of his underwater kingdom look and sound scarily similar to 2018’s Aquaman , which actually performed better on a technical level. Of course, James Cameron will probably have the last laugh with Avatar: The Way of Water next month. The blandness that Namor suffers from can also be found in Riri, aka Ironheart. Along with America Chavez from this year’s Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness and Kate Bishop from Hawkeye , Riri fills the role of the “young protege who needs to be saved by the current hero so that she can take their place.” Florence Pugh’s Yelena remains the cream of that crop, with Riri being adequate, yet entirely forgettable. Still, there are many things that Coogler does within Wakanda Forever that give it just enough personality. One of those things is the emotional heft he conveys through T’Challa’s passing, with the talented cast more than up to the challenge. Wright effortlessly takes on a leading role in this story, and Bassett brings her signature gravitas to every bit of dialogue. Barring the final battle, which, like the first Black Panther , looks shockingly poor, and some off-putting uses of slow motion, the action set pieces are thrilling. Danai Gurira as Okoye remains a venerable badass, wielding her spear with fury. Her introduction out of the shadows is one of the countless beautiful shots. Even with all its shortcomings, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever closes out a beleaguered Phase Four as one of its best entries thanks to its emotional honesty and quality action. Except those commendable attributes are in service to a lacking plot and an (at this point, expectedly) uninteresting villain. This return to the land of Wakanda was a welcome one, but it could have been so much more fruitful. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

The Last Thing He Wanted February 27, 2020 By: Button Hunter Friesen Netflix has been on a roll these past few years. While changing the idea of how television can be consumed, the streaming giant has also financed dozens of films from revered auteurs and budding talent. This level of investment has paid dividends with films such as The Irishman and Roma . But like all portfolios, there are some stinkers such as Bright and The Ridiculous 6 that blemish the hits. Joining the latter pile of garbage is the newest film to be dumped unceremoniously on Netflix: The Last Thing He Wanted . A journalist for The Atlantic Post , Elena McMahon made her mark with hard-hitting investigative pieces detailing the revolutions in 1980s Central America. One day, her secretive father attempts to reconnect with her after years apart. It’s revealed he’s rekindling their relationship because he has fallen victim to Alzheimer’s. With his final days winding down, he confesses that he is a gun smuggler for the Nicaraguan Contras and asks her to complete his final deal. To fulfill her father’s dying wish, Elena must go back to the place where everything began for her. Only this time she’s on the opposite side of the law than before. Reteaming with Netflix after the critical success of Mudbound , director Dee Rees makes some of the most shocking failures a respected filmmaker could make. Her command of the material is nonexistent as the plot and characters move along without any rhyme or reason. For a two-hour movie (that feels twice as long), Rees offers little in terms of suspense and subtlety. The choppy editing lacks any cohesiveness between its revolving door of throwaway characters and locations. Even when Rees is supplied with quality supplemental material, such as the score by Tamar-kali, she cues it at the most obvious times, turning it against her intentions. She does throw in a nice camera movement every once in a while, but it’s painfully obvious that it’s only being done to try and cover up the catastrophe that is being filmed. An example is the laughably bad final shot that looks ripped straight from a parody movie. Adapted by Rees and Marco Villalobos from the book of the same name, The Last Thing He Wanted is one of the most incomprehensible movies ever made. I would feel safe betting someone a billion dollars to watch this movie and then properly explain what they had just seen. The dialogue is both cliched and flowery as it makes even the smallest detail hard to comprehend. Characters speak English in a way so cryptic that it seems they aren’t even speaking English at all. No amount of rewinding or looking through a dictionary could help me understand what exactly someone was saying. Fortunately, the poor sound mixing makes half of the dialogue muddled, saving me from further anguish. Also part of the problem is the script’s overabundance of half-baked storylines and details. I would say that almost every one of these plots and subplots is filled with holes, but I’m not sure of what the plot was, to begin with. Characters and locations come and go, barely leaving a mark on the overall narrative. That is, until the end when Rees wraps a dozen different things up in the final three minutes, ending the film in a pile of disjointed pieces that produces more questions than answers. I know it’s a tired trope to say that a movie should have been a mini-series... but this seriously should have been a mini-series. Anne Hathaway is mediocre as our supposedly tough main character. Hathaway tries her best, but she is woefully miscast and can’t muster a sliver of enough fortitude to convince us of her believability. Ben Affleck plays a CIA agent hot on Elena’s trail. Affleck seems to have been on set for less than a week and has as much energy as someone who just woke up from a nap after downing a bottle of NyQuil. Factoring in his minuscule screen time, it’s safe to say that the main reason he was cast was to put his name on the poster. Playing the ailing father is Willem Dafoe, who has recently been on a career resurgence. Disappointingly, Dafoe falls into the type of hammy overacting that plagued the middle third of his career. The Last Thing He Wanted is a glaring misfire on the careers of the usually dependable cast and crew. It will surely land on many worst-of-the-year lists and may even take the top spot on a few. Thinking about this awful movie is the last thing I ever want to do. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Uncharted February 21, 2022 By: Button Hunter Friesen In terms of adapting a video game to film, Uncharted should have been the easiest one yet. The cinematic sequences are all there, from the plane ejection and sinking cruise ship in Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception , to the train sequence in Uncharted 2: Among Thieves . These levels contained some of the most impressive moments in video game history, with the sound and visuals delivering enough excitement to please even the most adventurous of spirits. Even though it seemed like a slam dunk on paper, publisher Sony struggled for years to get a film adaptation off the ground. They tried to get the ball rolling in 2008, only a year after the first game in the series was released. Things stagnated for a while until The Fighter and American Hustle writer/director David O. Russell was announced to be helming the project in 2010. In hindsight, Russell was an odd choice, and both parties were better off going their separate ways. Little did Sony know that Russell would only be the first of six directors to be attached to the project before leaving shortly after. Eventually, in 2017, Tom Holland was announced for the lead role of Nathan Drake, with Mark Wahlberg, the original choice for Nathan back in the Russell days, playing his older partner, Sully. Zombieland and Venom director Ruben Fleischer came aboard, and the film was finally completed after a decade of turmoil. And yet after all this time, I still would much rather play the Uncharted games a second time than watch the Uncharted movie again. Working as a mix-and-match of different story elements within the game series, Uncharted starts with the street-smart orphan Nathan Drake working at a bar. There he meets Sully, who offers to make Nathan his partner in a search for lost Spanish pirate gold worth nearly $5 billion. Also on the hunt for the treasure is Santiago Moncada, an heir to the family that funded the pirate’s expedition, who will stop at nothing to get what he wants. From there, the two parties bounce off each other in their hunt, which takes them from New York to Barcelona to the Philippines. Except it’s obvious that much of this movie never took place in any of those locations, with dubious green screening utilized as a cheap shortcut. The Uncharted games were often seen as the video game equivalent of the Indiana Jones series, with the bonus that Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End was a great fourth entry while Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull gets worse the more that hindsight allows. Both those series made great use of locations, taking the audience around the world on death-defying journeys. 2022’s Uncharted doesn’t have that authentic feeling of adventure, as everything is kept bottled up. The characters in the film are in disbelief at what’s happening, but we as the audience feel none of that. It’s all weightless and formulaic, plodding from one beat to the next. What saves Uncharted from being a total trainwreck is the relative likeability of its cast. No one can argue that Tom Holland has been one of, if not the best portrayals of Spider-Man. But the jury is still out if he can carry a film outside of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. He’s had little success over the years shedding his boyish looks in streaming titles such as The Devil All the Time or Cherry . Even if that same boyishness makes Holland a bit of a miscast, his charm and banterous chemistry with Wahlberg keep the film light on its toes. As far as video game adaptations go, Uncharted is one of the better ones if the bar it has to jump over is generously low. It makes a slightly amusing two hours, with nothing exceptional to make it stick once the credits roll. If you have more time to spare, I’d recommend playing the games. But if you only have two hours, you could do worse than seeing this. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Shazam! April 4, 2019 By: Button Hunter Friesen I would have called you crazy if you had told me that we get both a Captain Marvel and Shazam film in the same year. But stranger things have happened, which is something we’ve had to get used to over the past couple of years. So now the year is 2019 and both of these films have premiered within the span of a month. Unfortunately, as much as I am happy to see these films get their moment to shine, the experience that I got out of both of them didn’t match well with my expectations. This superhero origin story centers around Billy Batson, a troubled kid that has committed his whole life to running away from foster homes and finding his real mom. On one fateful day, Billy is approached by an all-seeing wizard that wishes to transfer his power to him so that he may fight off the seven deadly sins that seek to destroy humanity. By speaking the wizard’s name, Billy is suddenly transformed into the unstoppable superhero Shazam that possesses the combined powers of the Greek gods. With his nearly unlimited new powers, Billy must now set out to do good in the world, while still trying to find his real home. Shazam! is directed by David F. Sandberg, who has made his name with the horror films Annabelle: Creation and Lights Out . One admirable thing that can be said of Sandberg is his intention and ability to make this film a moderately fun ride throughout as it pokes fun at itself from time to time. To my regret, that is probably the only good thing that can be said about his directing, which has a consistent pattern of him pacing so much smaller material into an already overstuffed main narrative. The biggest issue that plagues Shazam! is that it always acts like it’s different from all the other superhero films, even though it really isn’t. This problem can be glaringly seen in the egregious 132-minute runtime, which follows the generic origin path where the hero gets their powers, has some struggles along the way, and then vanquishes evil in a climatic CGI battle. The one thing that this film does differently lies within its effects, which are a lot worse when compared to the competition. Written by Henry Gayden, Shazam! tries really hard (and fails) to be the family-friendly version of Deadpool . The problem that this film repeatedly runs into stems from the fact that Deadpool ’s style works solely on the effortless charm of Ryan Reynolds and its ability to be R-rated, two things that Shazam! sorely lacks. To be fair, a few of the jokes are actually quite funny, but the majority just fall flat and feel like a pale imitation. Another problem with Shazam! is the terrible one-dimensional villain, whose name I couldn’t remember until the credits rolled by. Basically, he’s a supervillain that does bad things because that’s what a supervillain does. Clear motives for his actions or any other defining character traits are nonexistent Retouching on the point of needless subplots, the whole storyline about the missing mother is handled quite amateurishly and laughably underwhelms in its conclusion. Part of the blame can be placed on Sandberg for spending too much time on it, but most of it should go to Gayden for not cutting this tedious and unimportant plot out of an already bloated story. Maybe the finest quality that this film has lies within its lead actor, Zachary Levi, who brings a lot of energy to the titular role. He’s no Ryan Reynolds, which he tries really hard to be, but he does a good enough job to cover many of the storytelling faults. Asher Angel plays Billy and does a below-average job. His performance of Billy as an insufferably meddling kid wildly contrasts with Levi’s and makes it really hard to believe both of them are playing the same core character. The villain role of Sivana is played by Mark Strong. Just like his character, Strong’s dull performance is immediately forgotten after watching. Lastly, Djimon Hounsou underwhelmingly stars as the wizard, who can best be described as a dollar-store version of Gandalf. After seven entries, the DCEU has yet to put out one above-average film. And although Shazam! falls prey to many of the same problems that have besieged the other films in the universe, the one thing that it can hang its hat on is its ability to be quite entertaining for a portion of its runtime. Still, don’t expect to be blown away, just moderately surprised. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Dumb Money September 9, 2023 By: Button Hunter Friesen Dumb Money had its World Premiere at the 2023 Toronto International Film Festival. Sony Pictures will release it in limited theaters on September 15, followed by a nationwide expansion on October 06. The Big Short , Vice , and Don’t Look Up writer/director Adam McKay has been accused by his detractors of thinking his audience is stupid, talking down to them through flashy celebrity cameos and on-the-nose dialogue. It’s not an incorrect opinion, but McKay has still always provided a compelling argument within his theses, with The Big Short offering a sobering retelling of the housing crisis. Craig Gillespie’s Dumb Money , premiering at the 2023 Toronto International Film Festival, REALLY wants to be The Big Short for Gen-Z, taking down the 1%ers who run Wall Street and rig it against the little guy. But this David vs. Goliath story doesn’t have the necessary charm or smarts to be as deadly as it thinks it is. “Hold the line!,” “Diamond hands!,” “Apes together strong,” and “I just like the stock,” were phrases that became popularized during the pandemic as the GameStop short squeeze rocked not just the financial industry, but the psyche of the American public. It all started on r/wallstreetbets, an internet forum famous for its memes and overly passionate members. Their prophet was Keith Gill (Paul Dano), a mild-mannered Massachusetts financial advisor who goes by “Roaring Kitty” because of his penchant use of cats in his live streams. He’s bullish on the GameStop (GME) stock, thinking that’s it undervalued and that all the hedge fund managers are fools to be in a short position. He seems crazy, but he has the numbers and quirkiness to attract other followers, including debt-ridden nurse Jenny (America Ferrera), GameStop employee Marcus (Anthony Ramos), and college students Riri (Myha'la Herrold) and Harmony (Talia Ryder). “If he’s in, I’m in” is what they all say, creating a surge in the stock price as more and more people jump on. Most of these traders were referred to as “dumb money” by the hedge funds and media. They’re just retail traders who always think they can beat the market but end up giving their money away to the big fish. Writers Lauren Schuker Blum and Rebecca Angelo, adapting the novel “The Antisocial Network” by Ben Mezrich, have compassion for these small fries. They’ve all been pushed down their whole lives, and the time is now to stand together. Unfortunately, none of these characters are that compelling outside of Keith, which largely stems from Dano’s charismatic commitment to playing the intellectual fool. They end up being a generic group, with little to separate themselves. The same goes for the villainous billionaires played by Seth Roge, Vincent D’Onofrio, and Nick Offerman. They’re caricatures of unearned wealth, another in a quickly tiring line found in Triangle of Sadness and Glass Onion last year. Gillespie continues his high-energy antics from I, Tonya (also premiering in Toronto in 2017) and Cruella , zipping the editing around this overstuffed cast. It keeps the film on its toes and the 100-minute runtime breezy, but it also keeps the details to a minimum. The exact (or even simplified) machinations of the short squeeze are given little attention, replaced by bright lights and a flurry of newsreel clips. Just like the memes that inspired the movement, Dumb Money is fun in the moment, but has little to no substance underneath the surface. If you’re looking for entertainment, you get just enough of it to make this worthwhile. If you’re looking to be educated on this event, I’d recommend literally anything else. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen

Blonde September 28, 2022 By: Button Hunter Friesen Maybe we as a society have been too harsh on Netflix? Sure, they spend an exorbitant amount of money on cinematic trash that they’ll claim broke viewership records, yet will never make a cultural impact (*cough* Red Notice & The Gray Man *cough*). And yes, they may have created a culture that’s more focused on constant consumption than finely tuned tasting. But while all of that was (and still is) true, they’ve also financed some of the finest works from our best filmmakers. They stepped in and supplied Martin Scorsese with $150 million to bring The Irishman to life, and also gave Alfonso Cuarón’s Roma a much grander life than any arthouse film has ever had before. They also ushered in the grand return of Jane Campion to the feature film landscape with The Power of the Dog , which was undeservedly robbed of a Best Picture win by their rival Apple TV+’s CODA . And with Andrew Dominik’s Blonde , the paradoxical streamer has added another feather to their cap. To be fair to Dominik, he did have to fight Netflix tooth and nail to release his cut of the film, which runs at a hefty 166 minutes and is saddled with the infamous NC-17 rating. One can’t wholly blame the distributor for trying to demand cuts to make the film a bit more “mainstream,” while at the same time ridiculing them for not fully understanding who they were getting into bed with. “Mainstream” never has, nor will it ever be, a word used to describe Dominik’s filmography. This is the man who brought us not one, but two, films starring Brad Pitt at the height of his stardom that bombed at the box office. That’s not to say the films deserved it though. The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and Killing Them Softly are both modern masterpieces that use their big-name stars for much more than good looks. The same goes for Blonde , which luckily won’t have to deal with the unneeded baggage of box office returns. Dominik uses star Ana de Armas to perfection, making her first solo leading role a mesmerizing experience. Telling the story of Marilyn Monroe, or Norma Jeane as that was her real name, Blonde has much more in common with David Lynch’s Inland Empire than it does with any biopic. A line by Monroe about one of her movies may as well have been planted by Dominik to describe his film: “You never know when the dream ends and the nightmare begins.” Working as a fever dream, Blonde interweaves between reality and fiction as it tracks Marilyn’s troubled upbringing to her untimely death. None of it happens in chronological (or just plain logical) order, with Dominik throwing the viewer, as well as Marilyn, through the wringer of her memories. The frames endlessly jump around as well, from a boxed-in sharp black-and-white that would even make Pawel Pawlikowski blush, to vivid widescreen technicolor. Through this, Dominik traps you in Marilyn’s world, never knowing what the next moment will bring, always looking ahead with a sense of unease. As Monroe, de Armas finds that vulnerability that made her such an enigma of a public figure. How could such a beautiful and tempting bombshell be so broken? It’s a physically and emotionally demanding role, with de Armas going for broke with unnerving fearlessness. If not for the film itself being so off-putting, Netflix should make a serious push for her in this year’s Oscar race. Of course, some viewers (mostly the ones that stumble upon this because they press play on whatever filled the home screen on Netflix) will cry foul at the liberties Dominik has taken with Monroe’s story. One enemy he’ll surely have is Oliver Stone, who presumably will take great umbrage at the film’s vitriolic portrayal of President Kennedy. But is Dominik’s film, and by extension the novel by Joyce Carol Oates, any more or less “true” than other biopics such as this year’s Elvis or Bohemian Rhapsody , which also took great creative liberties with a person’s life? Blonde does better than those films because even with inaccuracies towards details, it delivers a cinematic experience that relates us more to the figure than we did before pressing play. Just as The Northman did for Robert Eggers, Blonde illustrates why Andrew Dominik deserves all the money and creative freedom that any studio can afford. Fortunately for him (and us), Netflix indulged in his fantasies, allowing for a nightmarish and surreal experience that highlights the beautiful tragedy that was the life of Norma Jeane. More Reviews One Battle After Another September 24, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen A Christmas Party September 23, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Him September 18, 2025 By: Hunter Friesen Swiped September 19, 2025 By: Tyler Banark Hunter Friesen